[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] QueuePFN peculiarity in virtio-mmio
From: |
Laszlo Ersek |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] QueuePFN peculiarity in virtio-mmio |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Oct 2013 19:49:21 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130912 Thunderbird/17.0.9 |
Hi,
"Appendix X: virtio-mmio" in the virtio spec says
• 0x040 | RW | QueuePFN
[...] When the Guest stops using the queue it must write zero
(0x0) to this register.
[...]
and
Virtqueue Configuration
[...]
2. Check if the queue is not already in use: read QueuePFN
register, returned value should be zero (0x0).
[...]
I think this in itself is already suboptimal, because a guest that
crashes and reboots (while the emulator itself survives) will not be
able to use the device after said reboot (it has never re-set QueuePFN
to zero).
But, more importantly: I think that resetting the device (by writing 0
to its status register) should include (ie. *guarantee*) the effects of
setting QueuePFN to zero for all imaginable queues of the device.
This way, a defensive guest that starts up by resetting the device (*)
after identifying it via MagicValue / Version / DeviceID / VendorID
would be able to use the device regardless of the device's prior
QueuePFN setting(s).
(*) Resetting the device is the first step in "2.2.1 Device
Initialization Sequence". It "is not required on initial start up", but
as a guest driver can never be sure whether the startup in question is
the initial one, a defensive driver will always start with device reet.
The question arises because Olivier has posted a series to edk2-devel
that adds virtio-mmio support to TianoCore, and Mark tested it (using
OVMF) with a Linux guest and found problems. Namely, OVMF itself can
drive the virtio devices via virtio-mmio, but the Linux kernel booted
from OVMF can not. The reason is the missing zeroing of QueuePFN when
OVMF is exiting. (I'm just paraphrasing the analysis.)
I think
- that resetting the device (via its status register) should make the
host forget *all* prior configuration, including QueuePFN,
- and that the Linux driver should reset the device as first step.
So:
- What's the motivation for the "acquire/release" semantics of QueuePFN?
- Am I right that device reset should force a QueuePFN release too?
Thanks,
Laszlo
- [Qemu-devel] QueuePFN peculiarity in virtio-mmio,
Laszlo Ersek <=