qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] spapr_vscsi: Fix REPORT_LUNS handling


From: Nathan Whitehorn
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] spapr_vscsi: Fix REPORT_LUNS handling
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 11:51:18 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0

Any news on this? FreeBSD is unbootable from CDROM devices in QEMU/pseries without this patch.
-Nathan

On 10/18/13 07:33, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
Intercept REPORT_LUNS commands addressed either to SRP LUN 0 or the well-known
LUN for REPORT_LUNS commands. This is required to implement the SAM and SPC
specifications.

Since SRP implements only a single SCSI target port per connection, the SRP
target is required to report all available LUNs in response to a REPORT_LUNS
command addressed either to LUN 0 or the well-known LUN. Instead, QEMU was
forwarding such requests to the first QEMU SCSI target, with the result that
initiators that relied on this feature would only see LUNs on the first QEMU
SCSI target.

Behavior for REPORT_LUNS commands addressed to any other LUN is not specified
by the standard and so is left unchanged. This preserves behavior under Linux
and SLOF, which enumerate possible LUNs by hand and so address no commands
either to LUN 0 or the well-known REPORT_LUNS LUN.

Signed-off-by: Nathan Whitehorn <address@hidden>
---
  hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
index 2a26042..87e0fb3 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
+++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
@@ -63,6 +63,8 @@
  #define SCSI_SENSE_BUF_SIZE     96
  #define SRP_RSP_SENSE_DATA_LEN  18
+#define SRP_REPORT_LUNS_WLUN 0xc10100000000000
+
  typedef union vscsi_crq {
      struct viosrp_crq s;
      uint8_t raw[16];
@@ -720,12 +722,67 @@ static void vscsi_inquiry_no_target(VSCSIState *s, 
vscsi_req *req)
      }
  }
+static void vscsi_report_luns(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
+{
+    BusChild *kid;
+    int i, len, n, rc;
+    uint8_t *resp_data;
+    bool found_lun0;
+
+    n = 0;
+    found_lun0 = false;
+    QTAILQ_FOREACH(kid, &s->bus.qbus.children, sibling) {
+        SCSIDevice *dev = SCSI_DEVICE(kid->child);
+
+        n += 8;
+        if (dev->channel == 0 && dev->id == 0 && dev->lun == 0)
+            found_lun0 = true;
+    }
+    if (!found_lun0) {
+        n += 8;
+    }
+    len = n+8;
+
+    resp_data = malloc(len);
+    memset(resp_data, 0, len);
+    stl_be_p(resp_data, n);
+    i = found_lun0 ? 8 : 16;
+    QTAILQ_FOREACH(kid, &s->bus.qbus.children, sibling) {
+        DeviceState *qdev = kid->child;
+        SCSIDevice *dev = SCSI_DEVICE(qdev);
+
+        if (dev->id == 0 && dev->channel == 0)
+            resp_data[i] = 0;
+        else
+            resp_data[i] = (2 << 6);
+        resp_data[i] |= dev->id;
+        resp_data[i+1] = (dev->channel << 5);
+        resp_data[i+1] |= dev->lun;
+        i += 8;
+    }
+
+    vscsi_preprocess_desc(req);
+    rc = vscsi_srp_transfer_data(s, req, 0, resp_data, len);
+    free(resp_data);
+    if (rc < 0) {
+        vscsi_makeup_sense(s, req, HARDWARE_ERROR, 0, 0);
+        vscsi_send_rsp(s, req, CHECK_CONDITION, 0, 0);
+    } else {
+        vscsi_send_rsp(s, req, 0, len - rc, 0);
+    }
+}
+
  static int vscsi_queue_cmd(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
  {
      union srp_iu *srp = &req->iu.srp;
      SCSIDevice *sdev;
      int n, lun;
+ if ((srp->cmd.lun == 0 || be64_to_cpu(srp->cmd.lun) == SRP_REPORT_LUNS_WLUN) && srp->cmd.cdb[0] == REPORT_LUNS) {
+        vscsi_report_luns(s, req);
+        return 0;
+    }
+
      sdev = vscsi_device_find(&s->bus, be64_to_cpu(srp->cmd.lun), &lun);
      if (!sdev) {
          DPRINTF("VSCSI: Command for lun %08" PRIx64 " with no drive\n",




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]