qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu] cpu-exec: Optimize X86CPU usage in cpu_


From: Chen Fan
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu] cpu-exec: Optimize X86CPU usage in cpu_exec()
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 10:52:59 +0800

On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 03:38 +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Replace growing numbers of inline x86_env_get_cpu() with x86_cpu variable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <address@hidden>
> ---
>  cpu-exec.c | 14 ++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/cpu-exec.c b/cpu-exec.c
> index 2711c58..f7a215c 100644
> --- a/cpu-exec.c
> +++ b/cpu-exec.c
> @@ -206,6 +206,9 @@ int cpu_exec(CPUArchState *env)
>        (defined(TARGET_M68K) || defined(TARGET_PPC) || defined(TARGET_S390X)))
>      CPUClass *cc = CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
>  #endif
> +#ifdef TARGET_I386
> +    X86CPU *x86_cpu = X86_CPU(cpu);
> +#endif
Hi, Andreas,
   I think this defined grammar should correspond with other, of course
it's correct also.

>      int ret, interrupt_request;
>      TranslationBlock *tb;
>      uint8_t *tc_ptr;
> @@ -320,24 +323,24 @@ int cpu_exec(CPUArchState *env)
>  #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
>                      if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_POLL) {
>                          cpu->interrupt_request &= ~CPU_INTERRUPT_POLL;
> -                        apic_poll_irq(x86_env_get_cpu(env)->apic_state);
> +                        apic_poll_irq(x86_cpu->apic_state);
>                      }
>  #endif
>                      if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_INIT) {
>                              cpu_svm_check_intercept_param(env, SVM_EXIT_INIT,
>                                                            0);
> -                            do_cpu_init(x86_env_get_cpu(env));
> +                            do_cpu_init(x86_cpu);
>                              env->exception_index = EXCP_HALTED;
>                              cpu_loop_exit(env);
>                      } else if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_SIPI) {
> -                            do_cpu_sipi(x86_env_get_cpu(env));
> +                            do_cpu_sipi(x86_cpu);
>                      } else if (env->hflags2 & HF2_GIF_MASK) {
>                          if ((interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_SMI) &&
>                              !(env->hflags & HF_SMM_MASK)) {
>                              cpu_svm_check_intercept_param(env, SVM_EXIT_SMI,
>                                                            0);
>                              cpu->interrupt_request &= ~CPU_INTERRUPT_SMI;
> -                            do_smm_enter(x86_env_get_cpu(env));
> +                            do_smm_enter(x86_cpu);
>                              next_tb = 0;
>                          } else if ((interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI) &&
>                                     !(env->hflags2 & HF2_NMI_MASK)) {
> @@ -685,6 +688,9 @@ int cpu_exec(CPUArchState *env)
>        (defined(TARGET_M68K) || defined(TARGET_PPC) || defined(TARGET_S390X)))
>              cc = CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
>  #endif
> +#ifdef TARGET_I386
> +            x86_cpu = X86_CPU(cpu);
> +#endif
>          }
>      } /* for(;;) */
>  
Reviewed-by: Chen Fan <address@hidden>


Thanks.
Chen





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]