qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm: print suberror on all internal errors


From: Laszlo Ersek
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm: print suberror on all internal errors
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 18:20:38 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131118 Thunderbird/17.0.11

On 01/21/14 18:11, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> KVM introduced internal error exit reason and suberror at the same time,
> and later extended it with internal error data.
> QEMU does not report suberror on hosts between these two events because
> we check for the extension. (half a year in 2009, but it is misleading)
> 
> Fix by removing KVM_CAP_INTERNAL_ERROR_DATA condition on printf.
> 
> (partially improved by bb44e0d12df70 and ba4047cf848a3 in the past)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <address@hidden>
> ---
>  kvm-all.c | 7 +++----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c
> index 0bfb060..0a91d8e 100644
> --- a/kvm-all.c
> +++ b/kvm-all.c
> @@ -1539,17 +1539,16 @@ static void kvm_handle_io(uint16_t port, void *data, 
> int direction, int size,
>  
>  static int kvm_handle_internal_error(CPUState *cpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  {
> -    fprintf(stderr, "KVM internal error.");
> +    fprintf(stderr, "KVM internal error. Suberror: %d\n",
> +            run->internal.suberror);
> +
>      if (kvm_check_extension(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_INTERNAL_ERROR_DATA)) {
>          int i;
>  
> -        fprintf(stderr, " Suberror: %d\n", run->internal.suberror);
>          for (i = 0; i < run->internal.ndata; ++i) {
>              fprintf(stderr, "extra data[%d]: %"PRIx64"\n",
>                      i, (uint64_t)run->internal.data[i]);
>          }
> -    } else {
> -        fprintf(stderr, "\n");
>      }
>      if (run->internal.suberror == KVM_INTERNAL_ERROR_EMULATION) {
>          fprintf(stderr, "emulation failure\n");
> 

Based on earlier discussion

Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <address@hidden>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]