[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-next for-next 0/6] QOM realize for IndustryP
From: |
Andreas Färber |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-next for-next 0/6] QOM realize for IndustryPack |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Feb 2014 20:58:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 |
Am 06.08.2013 10:48, schrieb Alberto Garcia:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 11:16:55PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
>
>> This series converts IndustryPack devices to QOM realize/unrealize.
>>
>> It goes on to clean up file placement, promoting IndustryPack to use
>> its own subdirectory like PCI, ISA, virtio, etc.
>
>> Andreas Färber (6):
>> ipack: Convert to QOM realize
>> ipack: QOM parent field cleanup for IPackBus
>> ipack: QOM parent field cleanup for IPackDevice
I've now applied these three to qom-next.
>> ipack: Simplify VMSTATE_IPACK_DEVICE() macro
mst disliked the according change for a PCI VMState macro, so I've not
applied this; but my RFC VMState series has not received a lot of review
either since then, in particular not from Juan, and I've just uncovered
an issue with armv7m_nvic requiring a v2. I'll extend v2 to drop this
macro completely.
>> ipoctal232: QOM parent field cleanup
Rebased on lack of preceding patch as follows:
diff --git a/hw/char/ipoctal232.c b/hw/char/ipoctal232.c
index 6fe79da..99bab4d 100644
--- a/hw/char/ipoctal232.c
+++ b/hw/char/ipoctal232.c
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_ipoctal = {
.minimum_version_id = 1,
.minimum_version_id_old = 1,
.fields = (VMStateField[]) {
- VMSTATE_IPACK_DEVICE(dev, IPOctalState),
+ VMSTATE_IPACK_DEVICE(parent_obj, IPOctalState),
VMSTATE_STRUCT_ARRAY(ch, IPOctalState, N_CHANNELS, 1,
vmstate_scc2698_channel, SCC2698Channel),
VMSTATE_STRUCT_ARRAY(blk, IPOctalState, N_BLOCKS, 1,
>> ipack: Move IndustryPack out of hw/char/
There were unresolved IRC discussions with Paolo where exactly to place
which IndustryPack files, so that this series has been lying around.
Patch 03/06 makes it obvious that the header should live somewhere in
include/ for documenting the base QOM type though.
A minimally invasive alternative would be to move it from hw/char/ to
include/hw/char/ - would that be acceptable for everyone as first step?
The other issue was that while the ipoctal232 device is right in
hw/char/, tpci200.c and ipack.[hc] have nothing to do with char devices
- therefore this patch proposed hw/ipack/, matching drivers/ipack/ in Linux.
> Acked-by: Alberto Garcia <address@hidden>
https://github.com/afaerber/qemu-cpu/commits/qom-next
Thanks,
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-next for-next 0/6] QOM realize for IndustryPack,
Andreas Färber <=