[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC V2 2/9] vl: use qemu machine QOM class inste
|
From: |
Marcel Apfelbaum |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC V2 2/9] vl: use qemu machine QOM class instead of global machines list |
|
Date: |
Mon, 03 Mar 2014 15:03:47 +0200 |
On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 13:57 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 03/03/2014 13:58, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> > On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 03:07:05PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> >> > The machine registration flow is refactored to use the QOM functionality.
> >> > Instead of linking the machines into a list, each machine has a type
> >> > and the types can be traversed in the QOM way.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <address@hidden>
> > Nice.
Thanks!
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> >
> > This patch already looks like a nice cleanup. How about queueing
> > this and the preceding patch straight away?
> > Which tree is appropriate? I'm guessing QOM?
> >
>
> Fine by me.
Thanks!
Where can I find the QOM tree? I ask because I will rebase the series on this
tree...
Marcel
>
> Paolo
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC V2 2/9] vl: use qemu machine QOM class instead of global machines list, Andreas Färber, 2014/03/03
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC V2 5/9] qapi: output visitor crashes qemu if it encounters a NULL value, Marcel Apfelbaum, 2014/03/02
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC V2 0/9] qemu-machine as a QOM object, Paolo Bonzini, 2014/03/03