|
From: | Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC]VM live snapshot proposal |
Date: | Mon, 03 Mar 2014 14:19:37 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 |
Il 03/03/2014 13:55, Kevin Wolf ha scritto:
> > Due to memory-modifications may happen in kvm, qemu, or vhost, the key-part is how we > > can provide common page-modify-tracking-and-saving api, we completed a prototype by > > simply add modified-page tracking/saving function in qemu, and it seems worked fine.> > Yes, this is the tricky part. To be honest, I think this is the reason > no one has submitted patches - it's a hard task and the win isn't that > great (you can already migrate to file).So why don't we simply reuse the existing migration code?
I think this is different in the same way that block-backup and block-mirror are different. Huangpeng's proposal would let you make a consistent snapshot of disks and RAM.
Paolo
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |