qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.0] target-i386: reorder fields in cpu/msr_


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.0] target-i386: reorder fields in cpu/msr_hyperv_hypercall subsection
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 17:43:08 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0

Il 02/04/2014 17:42, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
On 2 April 2014 16:33, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
The subsection already exists in one well-known enterprise Linux
distribution, but for some strange reason the fields were swapped
when forward-porting the patch to upstream.

Limit headaches for said enterprise Linux distributor when the
time will come to rebase their version of QEMU.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
---
 target-i386/machine.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/target-i386/machine.c b/target-i386/machine.c
index 24bc373..168cab6 100644
--- a/target-i386/machine.c
+++ b/target-i386/machine.c
@@ -569,8 +569,8 @@ static const VMStateDescription 
vmstate_msr_hypercall_hypercall = {
     .minimum_version_id = 1,
     .minimum_version_id_old = 1,
     .fields      = (VMStateField []) {
-        VMSTATE_UINT64(env.msr_hv_hypercall, X86CPU),
         VMSTATE_UINT64(env.msr_hv_guest_os_id, X86CPU),
+        VMSTATE_UINT64(env.msr_hv_hypercall, X86CPU),
         VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
     }

Surely this is a migration compatibility break and you need to bump
the version fields here?

No, it was introduced in 2.0 so we're still in time.

Paolo




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]