Re: [Qemu-devel] Should we have a 2.0-rc3 ?

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 06:37:03PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 10 April 2014 12:17, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
> > So far I know of at least three fixes which should probably
> > go into 2.0
> 
> Status update:
> Applied:
>  * ACPI fixes (both sets)
>  * block queue
>  * SDL2 relative mode fixes
>  * fix for virtio-net CVE
>  * fix for qom-list crash
>  * my patch to stack-protector check
> Patches on list but need review/ack and/or not sure whether to apply:
>  * kvm_physical_sync_dirty_bitmap bug
>  * my fix to my stack-protector check patch (oops)
>  * vmxnet3 patches

I don't think we care about these unless we want to wait for
the rest of state loading patches too.
If not, the rule for 2.0 will still be "don't load
state from malicious sources".

> Raised as issues but no patches:
>  * PCI bus naming
>  * win64 virtio-scsi regression
> 
> Assistance welcomed in moving patches in the last two
> categories into either "ready to apply" or "not for 2.0" :-)
> 
> thanks
> -- PMM