[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 00/16] visitor+BER migration format
From: |
Dr. David Alan Gilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 00/16] visitor+BER migration format |
Date: |
Tue, 6 May 2014 19:58:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
* Markus Armbruster (address@hidden) wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <address@hidden> writes:
<snip>
> > OK but for a new machine type, let's default to BER, right?
> > I see no reason to keep supporting when non-BER when -M specifies 2.1
> > compatibility, do you?
>
> I fail to see the relation between machine type and migration's wire
> encoding.
New machine types are a useful but not definitive line in the sand. If
you enable something/change the default on a new machine type you know
it won't break any existing users since there aren't any.
Dve
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / address@hidden / Manchester, UK
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 00/16] visitor+BER migration format,
Dr. David Alan Gilbert <=