Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] machine: set default kernel_cmdline in machine_initfn()

[Marcel Apfelbaum]

On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 14:40 +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Thu, 29 May 2014 14:25:31 +0200
> Andreas Färber <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > Am 29.05.2014 14:21, schrieb Marcel Apfelbaum:
> > > On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 12:47 +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > >> Am 29.05.2014 11:47, schrieb Igor Mammedov:
> > >>> ... fixes freeing constant from vl.c by machine_finalize()
> > >>>
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
> > >>
> > >> Did you check whether there are any others in need of changes? I could
> > >> imagine kernel_irqchip does, and I see that we forgot to fix the
> > >> underscore in the property name, damn. Marcel, can you please look into
> > >> fixing that? I had outlined how to.
> > > Hi Andreas,
> > > 
> > > I didn't forget to do that, I responded on the mail thread why I think we 
> > > shouldn't,
> > > even if is against QOM best practices.
> > > I'll copy-paste:
> > > 
> > > Anyway, the real problem here is that what is elegant in this solution is:
> > >     machine_opts = qemu_get_machine_opts();
> > >     if (qemu_opt_foreach(machine_opts, object_set_property, 
> > > current_machine, 1) < 0) {
> > >         object_unref(OBJECT(current_machine));
> > >         exit(1);
> > >     }
> > > It automatically fills in the machine state properties with the options 
> > > from the command line.
> > > It will work with machine sub-types that have specific properties without 
> > > the need
> > > to manually add it to vl.c. The error flow is also elegant (if a sub-type 
> > > does not have the
> > > user supplied property).
> > > 
> > > If we use machine-specific wrappers to convert "_" -> "-" we loose the 
> > > above.
> > 
> > There was nothing machine-specific in my proposal. Only the
> > implementation of object_set_property() would need to be extended or
> > copied&modified à la X86CPU and only "-"-based properties added in
> > machine_initfn().
> 
> Maybe we can hack QemuOpts to do s/foo_moo/foo-moo/ ?
> Than there won't be need for an explicit conversion and it could be reused by 
> others,
> including X86CPU.
I like this idea, but this can't be generic for all QemuOpts right? Do you
mean adding a flag specifying we want this conversion?

Thanks,
Marcel 
> 
> 
> > > As an alternative we could rename the machine option to use "-"...
> > 
> > That's not been an option for command line compatibility reasons.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Andreas
> > 
>