qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] ivshmem: check the value returned by fstat(


From: zhanghailiang
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] ivshmem: check the value returned by fstat()
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 10:00:41 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1

Hi Michael,
Thanks for your review of this patch!

On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 04:25:44PM +0800, zhanghailiang wrote:
The function fstat() may fail, so check its return value.

Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang<address@hidden>
---
  hw/misc/ivshmem.c | 5 ++++-
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/misc/ivshmem.c b/hw/misc/ivshmem.c
index 768e528..2667e9f 100644
--- a/hw/misc/ivshmem.c
+++ b/hw/misc/ivshmem.c
@@ -324,7 +324,10 @@ static int check_shm_size(IVShmemState *s, int fd) {

      struct stat buf;

-    fstat(fd,&buf);
+    if (fstat(fd,&buf)<  0) {
+        fprintf(stderr, "Cannot stat IVSHMEM: %s\n", strerror(errno));
+        return -1;
+    }


That's a confusing error message:
1. You don't stat ivshmem. You stat a shmem fd. Also best to print fd #.
I will add this in next version of the patch.
2. Tell the user what action was taken, e.g. IVSHMEM failed to start.

      if (s->ivshmem_size>  buf.st_size) {
          fprintf(stderr,
--
I have check the places of calling this function, And found that, if this function return -1, qemu will call exit(-1). One of the callers is ivshmem_read(), the purpose of check_shm_size() is to forbid guest to map more memory than the object has allocated. So here is it suitable to return -1 if fstat() failed? Or just give a warning message and return 0?
what's your opinion? Thanks.
1.7.12.4


.


Best regards,
zhanghailiang




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]