qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 12/23] virtio-blk: Drop redundant VirtIOBlock


From: Max Reitz
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 12/23] virtio-blk: Drop redundant VirtIOBlock member conf
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 23:22:45 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1

On 16.09.2014 20:12, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Commit 12c5674 turned it into a pointer to member blk.conf.

Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <address@hidden>
---
  hw/block/virtio-blk.c          | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
  include/hw/virtio/virtio-blk.h |  1 -
  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
index 38ad38f..5943af5 100644
--- a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
+++ b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ static bool virtio_blk_sect_range_ok(VirtIOBlock *dev,
      if (sector & dev->sector_mask) {
          return false;
      }
-    if (size % dev->conf->logical_block_size) {
+    if (size % dev->blk.conf.logical_block_size) {
          return false;
      }
      bdrv_get_geometry(dev->bs, &total_sectors);
@@ -519,19 +519,20 @@ static void virtio_blk_reset(VirtIODevice *vdev)
  static void virtio_blk_update_config(VirtIODevice *vdev, uint8_t *config)
  {
      VirtIOBlock *s = VIRTIO_BLK(vdev);
+    BlockConf *conf = &s->blk.conf;
      struct virtio_blk_config blkcfg;
      uint64_t capacity;
-    int blk_size = s->conf->logical_block_size;
+    int blk_size = conf->logical_block_size;
bdrv_get_geometry(s->bs, &capacity);
      memset(&blkcfg, 0, sizeof(blkcfg));
      virtio_stq_p(vdev, &blkcfg.capacity, capacity);
      virtio_stl_p(vdev, &blkcfg.seg_max, 128 - 2);
-    virtio_stw_p(vdev, &blkcfg.cylinders, s->conf->cyls);
+    virtio_stw_p(vdev, &blkcfg.cylinders, conf->cyls);
      virtio_stl_p(vdev, &blkcfg.blk_size, blk_size);
-    virtio_stw_p(vdev, &blkcfg.min_io_size, s->conf->min_io_size / blk_size);
-    virtio_stw_p(vdev, &blkcfg.opt_io_size, s->conf->opt_io_size / blk_size);
-    blkcfg.heads = s->conf->heads;
+    virtio_stw_p(vdev, &blkcfg.min_io_size, conf->min_io_size / blk_size);
+    virtio_stw_p(vdev, &blkcfg.opt_io_size, conf->opt_io_size / blk_size);
+    blkcfg.heads = conf->heads;
      /*
       * We must ensure that the block device capacity is a multiple of
       * the logical block size. If that is not the case, let's use
@@ -543,13 +544,13 @@ static void virtio_blk_update_config(VirtIODevice *vdev, 
uint8_t *config)
       * divided by 512 - instead it is the amount of blk_size blocks
       * per track (cylinder).
       */
-    if (bdrv_getlength(s->bs) /  s->conf->heads / s->conf->secs % blk_size) {
-        blkcfg.sectors = s->conf->secs & ~s->sector_mask;
+    if (bdrv_getlength(s->bs) /  conf->heads / conf->secs % blk_size) {
+        blkcfg.sectors = conf->secs & ~s->sector_mask;
      } else {
-        blkcfg.sectors = s->conf->secs;
+        blkcfg.sectors = conf->secs;
      }
      blkcfg.size_max = 0;
-    blkcfg.physical_block_exp = get_physical_block_exp(s->conf);
+    blkcfg.physical_block_exp = get_physical_block_exp(&s->blk.conf);

Is there a reason for you not using "conf" instead of "&s->blk.conf" here?

Of course, it's not wrong, so with the one or the other:

Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <address@hidden>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]