qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/14] GPIO/IRQ QOMification: Phase 2 - Getti


From: Alexander Graf
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/14] GPIO/IRQ QOMification: Phase 2 - Getting rid of SYSBUS IRQs
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 23:49:39 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1


On 28.08.14 14:23, Alexander Graf wrote:
> 
> 
> On 28.08.14 13:59, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 15.08.14 07:29, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> So phase one was the QOMification of qemu_irq. This is the next step.
>>> We start to setup GPIOs as proper QOM objects. Inputs are child objects
>>> of their device. Outputs are settable Links and connection is made
>>> via proper setting of a QOM link.
>>>
>>> We then cleanup Sysbus to simply re-use device level GPIOs and get rid
>>> of it's special IRQ handling code.
>>>
>>> Depends of my pending QOM array property stuff (the "[*]" series):
>>>
>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-07/msg04116.html
>>>
>>> Changed since v1:
>>> Addressed Alex review
>>> Dropped IRQ g_new0 changes
>>
>> With this patch set applied, the e500 machine fails to start:
>>
>> $ ./ppc-softmmu/qemu-system-ppc -M ppce500 -nographic
>> qemu-system-ppc: attempt to add duplicate property 'sysbus-irq[*]' to
>> object (type 'openpic')
>> Aborted
> 
> Andreas pointed me to his qom-next branch where patches were that
> apparently are a prerequisite (doh, I should've read the cover letter).
> 
> Sorry for the fuss, it works like a charm ;).

Can I expect this to land upstream anytime soon? :)


Alex



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]