Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 10/10] target-arm: Add support for VIRQ and VFIQ

[Edgar E. Iglesias]

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 08:36:41PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 13 September 2014 05:29, Edgar E. Iglesias <address@hidden> wrote:
> > From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <address@hidden>
> >
> > Acked-by: Greg Bellows <address@hidden>
> > Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  cpu-exec.c              | 12 ++++++++++++
> >  target-arm/cpu.c        | 29 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >  target-arm/cpu.h        | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  target-arm/helper-a64.c |  2 ++
> >  target-arm/helper.c     |  4 ++++
> >  target-arm/internals.h  |  2 ++
> >  6 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/cpu-exec.c b/cpu-exec.c
> > index d017588..6203ba5 100644
> > --- a/cpu-exec.c
> > +++ b/cpu-exec.c
> > @@ -616,6 +616,18 @@ int cpu_exec(CPUArchState *env)
> >                          cc->do_interrupt(cpu);
> >                          next_tb = 0;
> >                      }
> > +                    if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_VIRQ
> > +                        && arm_excp_unmasked(cpu, EXCP_VIRQ)) {
> > +                        cpu->exception_index = EXCP_VIRQ;
> > +                        cc->do_interrupt(cpu);
> > +                        next_tb = 0;
> > +                    }
> > +                    if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_VFIQ
> > +                        && arm_excp_unmasked(cpu, EXCP_VFIQ)) {
> > +                        cpu->exception_index = EXCP_VFIQ;
> > +                        cc->do_interrupt(cpu);
> > +                        next_tb = 0;
> > +                    }
> 
> NB that this is going to conflict with RTH's
> patches to refactor this cpu-exec.c ifdef ladder,
> though not in a very hard to fix up way.

Right, thanks for the heads up.


> >  #elif defined(TARGET_UNICORE32)
> >                      if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD
> >                          && !(env->uncached_asr & ASR_I)) {
> > diff --git a/target-arm/cpu.c b/target-arm/cpu.c
> > index 7ea12bd..d7adcb2 100644
> > --- a/target-arm/cpu.c
> > +++ b/target-arm/cpu.c
> > @@ -41,7 +41,9 @@ static void arm_cpu_set_pc(CPUState *cs, vaddr value)
> >  static bool arm_cpu_has_work(CPUState *cs)
> >  {
> >      return cs->interrupt_request &
> > -        (CPU_INTERRUPT_FIQ | CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD | CPU_INTERRUPT_EXITTB);
> > +        (CPU_INTERRUPT_FIQ | CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD
> > +         | CPU_INTERRUPT_VFIQ | CPU_INTERRUPT_VIRQ
> > +         | CPU_INTERRUPT_EXITTB);
> >  }
> >
> >  static void cp_reg_reset(gpointer key, gpointer value, gpointer opaque)
> > @@ -193,20 +195,22 @@ static void arm_cpu_set_irq(void *opaque, int irq, 
> > int level)
> >  {
> >      ARMCPU *cpu = opaque;
> >      CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
> > +    static const int mask[] = {
> > +        [ARM_CPU_IRQ] = CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD,
> > +        [ARM_CPU_FIQ] = CPU_INTERRUPT_FIQ,
> > +        [ARM_CPU_VIRQ] = CPU_INTERRUPT_VIRQ,
> > +        [ARM_CPU_VFIQ] = CPU_INTERRUPT_VFIQ
> > +    };
> >
> >      switch (irq) {
> >      case ARM_CPU_IRQ:
> > -        if (level) {
> > -            cpu_interrupt(cs, CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD);
> > -        } else {
> > -            cpu_reset_interrupt(cs, CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD);
> > -        }
> > -        break;
> >      case ARM_CPU_FIQ:
> > +    case ARM_CPU_VIRQ:
> > +    case ARM_CPU_VFIQ:
> >          if (level) {
> > -            cpu_interrupt(cs, CPU_INTERRUPT_FIQ);
> > +            cpu_interrupt(cs, mask[irq]);
> >          } else {
> > -            cpu_reset_interrupt(cs, CPU_INTERRUPT_FIQ);
> > +            cpu_reset_interrupt(cs, mask[irq]);
> >          }
> 
> It seems like a bad idea to inject the VIRQ and VFIQ
> interrupts if the CPU doesn't implement them (ie if
> it doesn't implement EL2). We should probably hw_error()
> this case. (At least, that's what we'll do if we get one
> when KVM is enabled, so we might as well be consistent...)

Sounds good.

> 
> >          break;
> >      default:
> > @@ -256,9 +260,12 @@ static void arm_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
> >  #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> >      /* Our inbound IRQ and FIQ lines */
> >      if (kvm_enabled()) {
> > -        qdev_init_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), arm_cpu_kvm_set_irq, 2);
> > +        /* VIRQ and VFIQ are unused with KVM but we add them to maintain
> > +         * the same interface as non-KVM CPUs.
> > +         */
> > +        qdev_init_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), arm_cpu_kvm_set_irq, 4);
> >      } else {
> > -        qdev_init_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), arm_cpu_set_irq, 2);
> > +        qdev_init_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), arm_cpu_set_irq, 4);
> >      }
> >
> >      cpu->gt_timer[GTIMER_PHYS] = timer_new(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL, 
> > GTIMER_SCALE,
> > diff --git a/target-arm/cpu.h b/target-arm/cpu.h
> > index a5123f8..0333de1 100644
> > --- a/target-arm/cpu.h
> > +++ b/target-arm/cpu.h
> > @@ -53,6 +53,8 @@
> >  #define EXCP_STREX          10
> >  #define EXCP_HVC            11   /* HyperVisor Call */
> >  #define EXCP_SMC            12   /* Secure Monitor Call */
> > +#define EXCP_VIRQ           13
> > +#define EXCP_VFIQ           14
> >
> >  #define ARMV7M_EXCP_RESET   1
> >  #define ARMV7M_EXCP_NMI     2
> > @@ -67,6 +69,8 @@
> >
> >  /* ARM-specific interrupt pending bits.  */
> >  #define CPU_INTERRUPT_FIQ   CPU_INTERRUPT_TGT_EXT_1
> > +#define CPU_INTERRUPT_VIRQ  CPU_INTERRUPT_TGT_EXT_2
> > +#define CPU_INTERRUPT_VFIQ  CPU_INTERRUPT_TGT_EXT_3
> >
> >  /* The usual mapping for an AArch64 system register to its AArch32
> >   * counterpart is for the 32 bit world to have access to the lower
> > @@ -82,9 +86,12 @@
> >  #define offsetofhigh32(S, M) (offsetof(S, M) + sizeof(uint32_t))
> >  #endif
> >
> > -/* Meanings of the ARMCPU object's two inbound GPIO lines */
> > +/* Meanings of the ARMCPU object's four inbound GPIO lines */
> >  #define ARM_CPU_IRQ 0
> >  #define ARM_CPU_FIQ 1
> > +#define ARM_CPU_VIRQ 2
> > +#define ARM_CPU_VFIQ 3
> > +
> >
> 
> Spurious extra blank line.

Removed.

> 
> >  typedef void ARMWriteCPFunc(void *opaque, int cp_info,
> >                              int srcreg, int operand, uint32_t value);
> > @@ -1184,6 +1191,18 @@ static inline bool arm_excp_unmasked(CPUState *cs, 
> > unsigned int excp_idx)
> >       * EL2 if we are in NS EL0/1.
> >       */
> >      bool irq_can_hyp = !secure && cur_el < 2 && target_el == 2;
> > +    /* ARMv7-M interrupt return works by loading a magic value
> > +     * into the PC.  On real hardware the load causes the
> > +     * return to occur.  The qemu implementation performs the
> > +     * jump normally, then does the exception return when the
> > +     * CPU tries to execute code at the magic address.
> > +     * This will cause the magic PC value to be pushed to
> > +     * the stack if an interrupt occurred at the wrong time.
> > +     * We avoid this by disabling interrupts when
> > +     * pc contains a magic address.
> > +     */
> > +    bool irq_unmasked = !(env->daif & PSTATE_I)
> > +                        && (!IS_M(env) || env->regs[15] < 0xfffffff0);
> >
> >      /* Don't take exceptions if they target a lower EL.  */
> >      if (cur_el > target_el) {
> > @@ -1200,8 +1219,19 @@ static inline bool arm_excp_unmasked(CPUState *cs, 
> > unsigned int excp_idx)
> >          if (irq_can_hyp && (env->cp15.hcr_el2 & HCR_IMO)) {
> >              return true;
> >          }
> > -        return !(env->daif & PSTATE_I)
> > -               && (!IS_M(env) || env->regs[15] < 0xfffffff0);
> > +        return irq_unmasked;
> > +    case EXCP_VFIQ:
> > +        if (!secure && !(env->cp15.hcr_el2 & HCR_FMO)) {
> > +            /* VFIQs are only taken when hypervized and non-secure.  */
> > +            return false;
> > +        }
> > +        return !(env->daif & PSTATE_F);
> > +    case EXCP_VIRQ:
> > +        if (!secure && !(env->cp15.hcr_el2 & HCR_IMO)) {
> > +            /* VIRQs are only taken when hypervized and non-secure.  */
> > +            return false;
> > +        }
> > +        return irq_unmasked;
> >      default:
> >          g_assert_not_reached();
> >      }
> > diff --git a/target-arm/helper-a64.c b/target-arm/helper-a64.c
> > index 996dfea..bd16fe3 100644
> > --- a/target-arm/helper-a64.c
> > +++ b/target-arm/helper-a64.c
> > @@ -481,9 +481,11 @@ void aarch64_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
> >          env->cp15.esr_el[new_el] = env->exception.syndrome;
> >          break;
> >      case EXCP_IRQ:
> > +    case EXCP_VIRQ:
> >          addr += 0x80;
> >          break;
> >      case EXCP_FIQ:
> > +    case EXCP_VFIQ:
> >          addr += 0x100;
> >          break;
> >      default:
> > diff --git a/target-arm/helper.c b/target-arm/helper.c
> > index 3a9d1fc..2f7b6e6 100644
> > --- a/target-arm/helper.c
> > +++ b/target-arm/helper.c
> > @@ -3697,6 +3697,10 @@ unsigned int arm_excp_target_el(CPUState *cs, 
> > unsigned int excp_idx)
> >          }
> >          break;
> >      }
> > +    case EXCP_VIRQ:
> > +    case EXCP_VFIQ:
> > +        target_el = 1;
> > +        break;
> >      }
> >      return target_el;
> >  }
> > diff --git a/target-arm/internals.h b/target-arm/internals.h
> > index e15ae57..1e98102 100644
> > --- a/target-arm/internals.h
> > +++ b/target-arm/internals.h
> > @@ -55,6 +55,8 @@ static const char * const excnames[] = {
> >      [EXCP_STREX] = "QEMU intercept of STREX",
> >      [EXCP_HVC] = "Hypervisor Call",
> >      [EXCP_SMC] = "Secure Monitor Call",
> > +    [EXCP_VIRQ] = "Virtual IRQ",
> > +    [EXCP_VFIQ] = "Virtual FIQ",
> >  };
> >
> >  static inline void arm_log_exception(int idx)
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> 
> Where is the code to generate VIRQ and VFIQ based on
> HCR_EL2.VI and VF ?

I've scoped that out as future work (mentioned in the cover-letter).

Best regards,
Edgar