[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] is it possible to use a disk with multiple iothreads ?
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] is it possible to use a disk with multiple iothreads ? |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Oct 2014 15:47:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 |
On 10/27/2014 03:13 PM, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:
>>> That's very interesting! Please keep Josh and me in CC when you want to
>>> >>discuss the results.
> Here the aggregate results (perf report details attached in this mail)
>
> + 33,02% 3974368751 kvm [kernel.kallsyms]
>
>
>
> + 23,66% 2847206635 kvm libc-2.13.so
>
>
>
> + 18,79% 2262052133 kvm librados.so.2.0.0
>
>
>
> + 11,04% 1328581527 kvm librbd.so.1.0.0
>
>
>
> + 5,87% 706713737 kvm libpthread-2.13.so
>
>
>
> + 3,75% 451690142 kvm kvm
>
>
>
> + 2,74% 329457334 kvm libstdc++.so.6.0.17
>
>
>
> + 0,51% 61519664 kvm [vdso]
>
>
> + 0,42% 50000089 kvm libglib-2.0.so.0.3200.4
>
>
> + 0,15% 18119658 kvm libm-2.13.so
>
>
> + 0,05% 5705776 kvm librt-2.13.so
>
>
> + 0,00% 356625 kvm libz.so.1.2.7
>
>
>
>
>>> >> 23,66% 2847206635 kvm libc-2.13.so
> This one is mostly malloc,free,...
>
>
> I see almost same results using fio with rbdengine on the host (outside the
> kvm process).
> So I think they are all mostly related to librbd.
You are missing debug information unfortunately, but the slowdown seems
to be related to futexes.
Paolo