qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 63/88] exec: Handle multipage ranges in invalidate_a


From: Michael Roth
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 63/88] exec: Handle multipage ranges in invalidate_and_set_dirty()
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 11:34:07 -0600

From: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>

The code in invalidate_and_set_dirty() needs to handle addr/length
combinations which cross guest physical page boundaries. This can happen,
for example, when disk I/O reads large blocks into guest RAM which previously
held code that we have cached translations for. Unfortunately we were only
checking the clean/dirty status of the first page in the range, and then
were calling a tb_invalidate function which only handles ranges that don't
cross page boundaries. Fix the function to deal with multipage ranges.

The symptoms of this bug were that guest code would misbehave (eg segfault),
in particular after a guest reboot but potentially any time the guest
reused a page of its physical RAM for new code.

Cc: address@hidden
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
Message-id: address@hidden
(cherry picked from commit f874bf905ff2f8dcc17acbfc61e49a92a6f4d04b)
Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <address@hidden>
---
 exec.c                  |  6 ++----
 include/exec/ram_addr.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
index a7d7daa..bfee04a 100644
--- a/exec.c
+++ b/exec.c
@@ -2009,10 +2009,8 @@ int cpu_memory_rw_debug(CPUState *cpu, target_ulong addr,
 static void invalidate_and_set_dirty(hwaddr addr,
                                      hwaddr length)
 {
-    if (cpu_physical_memory_is_clean(addr)) {
-        /* invalidate code */
-        tb_invalidate_phys_page_range(addr, addr + length, 0);
-        /* set dirty bit */
+    if (cpu_physical_memory_range_includes_clean(addr, length)) {
+        tb_invalidate_phys_range(addr, addr + length, 0);
         cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty_range_nocode(addr, length);
     }
     xen_modified_memory(addr, length);
diff --git a/include/exec/ram_addr.h b/include/exec/ram_addr.h
index 6593be1..e50e71c 100644
--- a/include/exec/ram_addr.h
+++ b/include/exec/ram_addr.h
@@ -49,6 +49,21 @@ static inline bool cpu_physical_memory_get_dirty(ram_addr_t 
start,
     return next < end;
 }
 
+static inline bool cpu_physical_memory_get_clean(ram_addr_t start,
+                                                 ram_addr_t length,
+                                                 unsigned client)
+{
+    unsigned long end, page, next;
+
+    assert(client < DIRTY_MEMORY_NUM);
+
+    end = TARGET_PAGE_ALIGN(start + length) >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS;
+    page = start >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS;
+    next = find_next_zero_bit(ram_list.dirty_memory[client], end, page);
+
+    return next < end;
+}
+
 static inline bool cpu_physical_memory_get_dirty_flag(ram_addr_t addr,
                                                       unsigned client)
 {
@@ -64,6 +79,16 @@ static inline bool cpu_physical_memory_is_clean(ram_addr_t 
addr)
     return !(vga && code && migration);
 }
 
+static inline bool cpu_physical_memory_range_includes_clean(ram_addr_t start,
+                                                            ram_addr_t length)
+{
+    bool vga = cpu_physical_memory_get_clean(start, length, DIRTY_MEMORY_VGA);
+    bool code = cpu_physical_memory_get_clean(start, length, 
DIRTY_MEMORY_CODE);
+    bool migration =
+        cpu_physical_memory_get_clean(start, length, DIRTY_MEMORY_MIGRATION);
+    return vga || code || migration;
+}
+
 static inline void cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty_flag(ram_addr_t addr,
                                                       unsigned client)
 {
-- 
1.9.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]