[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] pflash_cfi01: allow reading/writing it
From: |
Edgar E. Iglesias |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] pflash_cfi01: allow reading/writing it only in secure mode |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Apr 2015 09:30:15 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 06:27:42PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 09/04/2015 18:10, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> > In OVMF, the reset vector and the SEC phase code run from (read-only)
> > flash. SEC decompresses everything else to RAM. Also, SEC does not
> > access read-write flash (the varstore) at all.
> >
> > The above is a specialty of OVMF. In ArmVirtualizationQemu (aka AAVMF),
> > two further module types run from flash, after SEC: PEI_CORE, and some
> > PEIMs (ie. the PEI phase comes into the picture). During PEI, read-only
> > access to the varstore should be supported.
>
> Read-only access should always be fine (though with a tweak to these
> patches, and slower---because it exits to QEMU---if another CPU is
> looking at the flash in MMIO mode). The problem is execution.
>
> But on x86 flash should never be accessed by multiple CPUs at the same
> time, unless all of them know that the flash is in ROM mode.
>
> As I understand it, on ARM secure (EL3) and non-secure (EL<3) modes have
> effectively different address spaces. Therefore, one EL3 CPU could put
> the flash in MMIO mode for programming, while another EL1 CPU could be
> reading from the flash in ROM mode. In QEMU, this could be implemented
> with two memory regions and per-CPU address spaces. These patches
> should not get in the way, but they would not be useful.
Right, that matches my understanding.
Thanks,
Edgar
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] pflash_cfi01: change big-endian property to BIT type, (continued)
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] pflash_cfi01: change big-endian property to BIT type, Paolo Bonzini, 2015/04/09
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] pflash_cfi01: add secure property, Paolo Bonzini, 2015/04/09
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] pflash_cfi01: change to new-style MMIO accessors, Paolo Bonzini, 2015/04/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] pflash_cfi01: allow reading/writing it only in secure mode, Peter Maydell, 2015/04/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] pflash_cfi01: allow reading/writing it only in secure mode, Paolo Bonzini, 2015/04/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] pflash_cfi01: allow reading/writing it only in secure mode, Peter Maydell, 2015/04/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] pflash_cfi01: allow reading/writing it only in secure mode, Edgar E. Iglesias, 2015/04/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] pflash_cfi01: allow reading/writing it only in secure mode, Paolo Bonzini, 2015/04/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] pflash_cfi01: allow reading/writing it only in secure mode, Laszlo Ersek, 2015/04/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] pflash_cfi01: allow reading/writing it only in secure mode, Paolo Bonzini, 2015/04/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] pflash_cfi01: allow reading/writing it only in secure mode,
Edgar E. Iglesias <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] pflash_cfi01: allow reading/writing it only in secure mode, Peter Maydell, 2015/04/10