qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 4/4] hw/pci-bridge: format SeaBIOS-compliant


From: Marcel Apfelbaum
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 4/4] hw/pci-bridge: format SeaBIOS-compliant OFW device node for PXB
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 13:08:06 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0

On 06/13/2015 04:52 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
SeaBIOS expects OpenFirmware device paths in the "bootorder" fw_cfg file
to follow the pattern

   /address@hidden/address@hidden/...

for devices that live behind an extra root bus. The extra root bus in
question is the N'th among the extra root bridges. (In other words, N
gives the position of the affected extra root bus relative to the other
extra root buses, in bus_nr order.) N starts at 1, and is formatted in
hex.

The "address@hidden" node text is hardcoded in SeaBIOS (see the macro
FW_PCI_DOMAIN).

Cc: Kevin O'Connor <address@hidden>
Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum <address@hidden>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <address@hidden>
---

Notes:
     v4:
     - new in v4

  hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c 
b/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
index c7a085d..bed8ec9 100644
--- a/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
+++ b/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
@@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ typedef struct PXBDev {
      uint16_t numa_node;
  } PXBDev;

+static GList *pxb_dev_list;
+
  #define TYPE_PXB_HOST "pxb-host"

  static int pxb_bus_num(PCIBus *bus)
@@ -88,12 +90,29 @@ static const char *pxb_host_root_bus_path(PCIHostState 
*host_bridge,
      return bus->bus_path;
  }

+static char *pxb_host_ofw_unit_address(SysBusDevice *dev)
+{
+    PCIHostState *host = PCI_HOST_BRIDGE(dev);
+    PCIBus *bus;
+    PXBDev *pxb;
+    int position;
+
+    bus = host->bus;
+    pxb = PXB_DEV(bus->parent_dev);
+    position = g_list_index(pxb_dev_list, pxb);
+    assert(position >= 0);
+
+    return g_strdup_printf("%x/address@hidden", position + 1);
+}
+
  static void pxb_host_class_init(ObjectClass *class, void *data)
  {
      DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(class);
+    SysBusDeviceClass *sbc = SYS_BUS_DEVICE_CLASS(class);
      PCIHostBridgeClass *hc = PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_CLASS(class);

-    dc->fw_name = "pci";
+    dc->fw_name = "pci-root";
+    sbc->explicit_ofw_unit_address = pxb_host_ofw_unit_address;
      hc->root_bus_path = pxb_host_root_bus_path;
  }

@@ -148,6 +167,15 @@ static int pxb_map_irq_fn(PCIDevice *pci_dev, int pin)
      return pin - PCI_SLOT(pxb->devfn);
  }

+static gint pxb_compare(gconstpointer a, gconstpointer b)
+{
+    const PXBDev *pxb_a = a, *pxb_b = b;
+
+    return pxb_a->bus_nr < pxb_b->bus_nr ? -1 :
+           pxb_a->bus_nr > pxb_b->bus_nr ?  1 :
+           0;
+}
return pxb_a->bus_nr - pxb_b->bus_nr ? :)

This will not hold the series... I can send a patch on top.


Thanks,
Marcel

+
  static int pxb_dev_initfn(PCIDevice *dev)
  {
      PXBDev *pxb = PXB_DEV(dev);
@@ -190,9 +218,17 @@ static int pxb_dev_initfn(PCIDevice *dev)
                                 PCI_STATUS_66MHZ | PCI_STATUS_FAST_BACK);
      pci_config_set_class(dev->config, PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST);

+    pxb_dev_list = g_list_insert_sorted(pxb_dev_list, pxb, pxb_compare);
      return 0;
  }

+static void pxb_dev_exitfn(PCIDevice *pci_dev)
+{
+    PXBDev *pxb = PXB_DEV(pci_dev);
+
+    pxb_dev_list = g_list_remove(pxb_dev_list, pxb);
+}
+
  static Property pxb_dev_properties[] = {
      /* Note: 0 is not a legal a PXB bus number. */
      DEFINE_PROP_UINT8("bus_nr", PXBDev, bus_nr, 0),
@@ -206,6 +242,7 @@ static void pxb_dev_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void 
*data)
      PCIDeviceClass *k = PCI_DEVICE_CLASS(klass);

      k->init = pxb_dev_initfn;
+    k->exit = pxb_dev_exitfn;
      k->vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_REDHAT;
      k->device_id = PCI_DEVICE_ID_REDHAT_PXB;
      k->class_id = PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST;





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]