[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH v16 3/6] kvm-all.c: add qemu_irq/gsi hash
From: |
Eric Auger |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH v16 3/6] kvm-all.c: add qemu_irq/gsi hash table and utility routines |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Jun 2015 13:56:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 |
Hi Peter,
On 06/26/2015 01:41 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 15 June 2015 at 17:33, Eric Auger <address@hidden> wrote:
>> VFIO platform device needs to setup irqfd but it does not know the
>> gsi corresponding to the device qemu_irq. This series proposes to
>> store a hash table in kvm_state using the qemu_irq as key and the gsi
>> as a value.
>>
>> kvm_irqchip_set_qemuirq_gsi allows to insert such a pair. The interrupt
>> controller is supposed to use it.
>>
>> kvm_irqchip_[add, remove]_irqfd_notifier allows to setup/tear down
>> irqfd directly from the qemu_irq.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <address@hidden>
>> Tested-by: Vikram Sethi <address@hidden>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> v15 -> v16:
>> - Added Vikram's T-b
>>
>> v13 -> v14:
>> - correct checkpatch warning
>>
>> v2 -> v3 (integration into VFIO series v13):
>> - rename kvm_irqchip_[add, remove]_qemuirq_irqfd_notifier into
>> kvm_irqchip_[add, remove]_irqfd_notifier. Possible since legacy
>> functions were also renamed with _gsi suffix.
>>
>> V1 -> v2:
>> - qemu_irq get_gsi callback replaced by hash table stored in kvm
>> ---
>> include/sysemu/kvm.h | 6 ++++++
>> kvm-all.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/sysemu/kvm.h b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
>> index acb3025..ba612fc 100644
>> --- a/include/sysemu/kvm.h
>> +++ b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>> #include "qemu/queue.h"
>> #include "qom/cpu.h"
>> #include "exec/memattrs.h"
>> +#include "hw/irq.h"
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_KVM
>> #include <linux/kvm.h>
>> @@ -420,6 +421,11 @@ int kvm_irqchip_add_irqfd_notifier_gsi(KVMState *s,
>> EventNotifier *n,
>> EventNotifier *rn, int virq);
>> int kvm_irqchip_remove_irqfd_notifier_gsi(KVMState *s, EventNotifier *n,
>> int virq);
>> +int kvm_irqchip_add_irqfd_notifier(KVMState *s, EventNotifier *n,
>> + EventNotifier *rn, qemu_irq irq);
>> +int kvm_irqchip_remove_irqfd_notifier(KVMState *s, EventNotifier *n,
>> + qemu_irq irq);
>> +void kvm_irqchip_set_qemuirq_gsi(KVMState *s, qemu_irq irq, int gsi);
>> void kvm_pc_gsi_handler(void *opaque, int n, int level);
>> void kvm_pc_setup_irq_routing(bool pci_enabled);
>> void kvm_init_irq_routing(KVMState *s);
>> diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c
>> index 730b818..939bfc4 100644
>> --- a/kvm-all.c
>> +++ b/kvm-all.c
>> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
>> #include "exec/address-spaces.h"
>> #include "qemu/event_notifier.h"
>> #include "trace.h"
>> +#include "hw/irq.h"
>>
>> #include "hw/boards.h"
>>
>> @@ -98,6 +99,7 @@ struct KVMState
>> * unsigned, and treating them as signed here can break things */
>> unsigned irq_set_ioctl;
>> unsigned int sigmask_len;
>> + GHashTable *gsimap;
>> #ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
>> struct kvm_irq_routing *irq_routes;
>> int nr_allocated_irq_routes;
>> @@ -1339,6 +1341,39 @@ int kvm_irqchip_remove_irqfd_notifier_gsi(KVMState
>> *s, EventNotifier *n,
>> false);
>> }
>>
>> +int kvm_irqchip_add_irqfd_notifier(KVMState *s, EventNotifier *n,
>> + EventNotifier *rn, qemu_irq irq)
>> +{
>> + gpointer key, gsi;
>> + gboolean found = g_hash_table_lookup_extended(s->gsimap, irq, &key,
>> &gsi);
>> +
>> + if (!found) {
>> + return -ENXIO;
>> + } else {
>> + return kvm_irqchip_add_irqfd_notifier_gsi(s, n, rn,
>> + GPOINTER_TO_UINT(gsi));
>
> Why do we use GPOINTER_TO_UINT() here...
Hum yes GPOINTER_TO_INT is in accordance with
kvm_irqchip_add_irqfd_notifier_gsi signature
>
>
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +int kvm_irqchip_remove_irqfd_notifier(KVMState *s, EventNotifier *n,
>> + qemu_irq irq)
>> +{
>> + gpointer key, gsi;
>> + gboolean found = g_hash_table_lookup_extended(s->gsimap, irq, &key,
>> &gsi);
>> +
>> + if (!found) {
>> + return -ENXIO;
>> + } else {
>> + return kvm_irqchip_remove_irqfd_notifier_gsi(s, n,
>> + GPOINTER_TO_INT(gsi));
>
> ...but GPOINTER_TO_INT() here?
>
> (Aside: you don't need to put this code in an else {} clause, because
> the if() part is returning anyway.)
Indeed.
Do you wish I re-submit all the VFIO remaining patches as v17 or only
that one?
Thanks
Eric
>
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +void kvm_irqchip_set_qemuirq_gsi(KVMState *s, qemu_irq irq, int gsi)
>> +{
>> + g_hash_table_insert(s->gsimap, irq, GINT_TO_POINTER(gsi));
>> +}
>> +
>> static int kvm_irqchip_create(MachineState *machine, KVMState *s)
>> {
>> int ret;
>> @@ -1371,6 +1406,8 @@ static int kvm_irqchip_create(MachineState *machine,
>> KVMState *s)
>>
>> kvm_init_irq_routing(s);
>>
>> + s->gsimap = g_hash_table_new(g_direct_hash, g_direct_equal);
>> +
>> return 0;
>> }
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
>
- [Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH v16 0/6] KVM platform device passthrough, Eric Auger, 2015/06/15
- [Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH v16 3/6] kvm-all.c: add qemu_irq/gsi hash table and utility routines, Eric Auger, 2015/06/15
- [Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH v16 2/6] kvm: rename kvm_irqchip_[add, remove]_irqfd_notifier with gsi suffix, Eric Auger, 2015/06/15
- [Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH v16 4/6] intc: arm_gic_kvm: set the qemu_irq/gsi mapping, Eric Auger, 2015/06/15
- [Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH v16 6/6] hw/vfio/platform: add irqfd support, Eric Auger, 2015/06/15