Re: [Qemu-devel] [aswg] request for ACPI ID for QEMU

[Doran, Mark]

That's OK, Michael, I've been called a lot worse :)  I'm back in the office 
today.  I don't know where this is, let me see where it is in the queue with 
the admins for update on the site.

Please note: I replied to you and the public list only...we try not to mix up 
postings to the UEFI mailing list aliases (which have formal UEFI 
Confidentiality rules associated) and more public mailing lists.  It's easier 
for us to rule that out that in all cases rather than try and explain what's OK 
to cross post like that and what isn't (this kind of question being of course 
not of concern in actuality).  I would appreciate your patience and help on 
that, thanks.
--
Cheers,
 
Mark.
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 2:52 AM
> To: Doran, Mark
> Cc: address@hidden; address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [aswg] request for ACPI ID for QEMU
> 
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:04:23AM +0000, Doran, Mark wrote:
> > Hi Everyone:
> >
> >
> >
> > The QEMU community would like to register a vendor ID prefix for use
> > with QEMU and some of the drivers for “soft” devices used in that VM
> > environment.  After some discussion the consensus is to have Red Hat
> > be the registered keeper of said ID for listing purposes.
> >
> >
> >
> > The first choice for this ID is “QEMU” – that’s available and meets
> > the other selection criteria.
> >
> >
> >
> > Please review the request and let me know if you see any issues or
> concerns.
> > The web site will get updated next week for this unless I hear a
> > reason not to do that.
> 
> Hello, Dotan,
> The web site doesn't appear to be updated yet.
> Where should I look for it?
> 
> 
> > --
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> >
> >
> > Mark.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature