qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/16 v1] tilegx: Firstly add tilegx target for


From: gchen gchen
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/16 v1] tilegx: Firstly add tilegx target for linux-user
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 05:27:58 +0800

On 8/21/15 13:15, Richard Henderson wrote:
> First off, this isn't v1. The previous patch set you posted was v12.
>
> On 08/20/2015 02:32 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>> Chen Gang (16):
>> linux-user: tilegx: Firstly add architecture related features
>> linux-user: Support tilegx architecture in linux-user
>> linux-user/syscall.c: conditionalize syscalls which are not defined in
>> tilegx
>> target-tilegx: Add opcode basic implementation from Tilera Corporation
>> target-tilegx/opcode_tilegx.h: Modify it to fit QEMU usage
>> target-tilegx: Add special register information from Tilera
>> Corporation
>> target-tilegx: Add cpu basic features for linux-user
>> target-tilegx: Add several helpers for instructions translation
>> target-tilegx: Generate tcg instructions to finish "Hello world"
>
> This patch is too big. Way way too big.
>

OK.

> We've discussed this before, and you changed the v9 patch set in the correct 
> direction (though it wasn't split far enough). But then you merged them all 
> back together in v10. That's just unacceptable.
>

OK, thanks. I guess, these was a misunderstanding.

>> target-tilegx: Add TILE-Gx building files
>> target-tilegx: Add related feature to support iret instruction
>> target-tilegx: Implement decode_rrr_8_opcode_y0
>> target-tilegx: Use int8_t instead of uint8_t for imm8 in gen_st_add()
>> linux-user: main: Use negative qemu errno for syscall return errno
>> tilegx: Match with the latest qemu master tree
>
> These three patches are fixes for previous patches should have been merged 
> back into the respective original patches.
>

OK, thanks.

>> target-tilegx: Implement additional instructions in normal working
>> flow
>
> This patch is also too big.
>

OK.

> In addition, I believe there's a better way to organize the decoding. I 
> mentioned this before in one of the review cycles, but this was not followed 
> up from either your side or mine. I've spent the evening flushing out the 
> idea and will follow up with a patch set.

OK, thanks.

Thanks.
--
Chen Gang

Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed
                                          


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]