qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 04/10] target-arm: Add VTCR_EL2


From: Edgar E. Iglesias
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 04/10] target-arm: Add VTCR_EL2
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 16:36:49 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 03:19:37PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 3 September 2015 at 21:14, Edgar E. Iglesias
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <address@hidden>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  target-arm/cpu.h    |  1 +
> >  target-arm/helper.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/target-arm/cpu.h b/target-arm/cpu.h
> > index 31825d3..ba22e12 100644
> > --- a/target-arm/cpu.h
> > +++ b/target-arm/cpu.h
> > @@ -223,6 +223,7 @@ typedef struct CPUARMState {
> >          };
> >          /* MMU translation table base control. */
> >          TCR tcr_el[4];
> > +        TCR vtcr_el2; /* Virtualization Translation Control.  */
> >          uint32_t c2_data; /* MPU data cachable bits.  */
> >          uint32_t c2_insn; /* MPU instruction cachable bits.  */
> >          union { /* MMU domain access control register
> > diff --git a/target-arm/helper.c b/target-arm/helper.c
> > index a057a70..c82aa1d 100644
> > --- a/target-arm/helper.c
> > +++ b/target-arm/helper.c
> > @@ -325,6 +325,21 @@ void init_cpreg_list(ARMCPU *cpu)
> >      g_list_free(keys);
> >  }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Some registers are not accessible if EL3.NS=0 and EL3 is using AArch32 
> > but
> > + * they are accesible when EL3 is using AArch64 regardless of EL3.NS.
> > + */
> > +static CPAccessResult access_el3_aa32ns_aa64any(CPUARMState *env,
> > +                                                const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
> > +{
> > +    bool secure = arm_is_secure_below_el3(env);
> > +
> > +    if (secure && !arm_el_is_aa64(env, 3)) {
> > +        return CP_ACCESS_TRAP_UNCATEGORIZED;
> > +    }
> > +    return CP_ACCESS_OK;
> > +}
> 
> This access function will always return OK for the AArch64 register,
> so probably better to split the regdef rather than using STATE_BOTH,
> and then avoid the accessfn on the 64-bit register.
> 
> > +
> >  static void dacr_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri, uint64_t 
> > value)
> >  {
> >      ARMCPU *cpu = arm_env_get_cpu(env);
> > @@ -3112,6 +3127,10 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo el3_no_el2_cp_reginfo[] = {
> >      { .name = "TCR_EL2", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
> >        .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 4, .crn = 2, .crm = 0, .opc2 = 2,
> >        .access = PL2_RW, .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = 0 },
> > +    { .name = "VTCR_EL2", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
> > +      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 4, .crn = 2, .crm = 1, .opc2 = 2,
> > +      .access = PL2_RW, .accessfn = access_el3_aa32ns_aa64any,
> > +      .readfn = arm_cp_read_zero, .writefn = arm_cp_write_ignore },
> 
> RAZ/WI register should use CP_CONST/resetvalue=0. (Access functions
> apply even for const registers.)
> 
> >      { .name = "SCTLR_EL2", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
> >        .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 4, .crn = 1, .crm = 0, .opc2 = 0,
> >        .access = PL2_RW, .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = 0 },
> > @@ -3246,6 +3265,12 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo el2_cp_reginfo[] = {
> >        .access = PL2_RW, .writefn = vmsa_tcr_el1_write,
> >        .resetfn = vmsa_ttbcr_reset, .raw_writefn = raw_write,
> >        .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.tcr_el[2]) },
> > +    { .name = "VTCR_EL2", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
> > +      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 4, .crn = 2, .crm = 1, .opc2 = 2,
> > +      .access = PL2_RW, .accessfn = access_el3_aa32ns_aa64any,
> > +      .writefn = vmsa_tcr_el1_write,
> 
> There's no AS bit in the VTCR_EL2, so you could avoid an unnecessary
> TLB flush by not using the writefn we use for TCR_EL1. (I think
> that if you don't provide a writefn or raw_writefn it should just
> work, but check that...)

I think you are right, nice catch. I'll fix all of these up.

Cheers,
Edgar


> 
> > +      .resetfn = vmsa_ttbcr_reset, .raw_writefn = raw_write,
> > +      .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.vtcr_el2) },
> >      { .name = "SCTLR_EL2", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
> >        .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 4, .crn = 1, .crm = 0, .opc2 = 0,
> >        .access = PL2_RW, .raw_writefn = raw_write, .writefn = sctlr_write,
> > @@ -5735,8 +5760,7 @@ static inline bool 
> > regime_translation_disabled(CPUARMState *env,
> >  static inline TCR *regime_tcr(CPUARMState *env, ARMMMUIdx mmu_idx)
> >  {
> >      if (mmu_idx == ARMMMUIdx_S2NS) {
> > -        /* TODO: return VTCR_EL2 */
> > -        g_assert_not_reached();
> > +        return &env->cp15.vtcr_el2;
> >      }
> >      return &env->cp15.tcr_el[regime_el(env, mmu_idx)];
> >  }
> 
> thanks
> -- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]