qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] spapr_drc: don't allow 'empty' DRCs to be un


From: Michael Roth
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] spapr_drc: don't allow 'empty' DRCs to be unisolated
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 12:19:22 -0500
User-agent: alot/0.3.6

Quoting David Gibson (2015-09-08 23:10:41)
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 06:44:55PM -0500, Michael Roth wrote:
> > Logical resources start with allocation-state:UNUSABLE /
> > isolation-state:ISOLATED. During hotplug, guests will transition
> > them to allocate-state:USABLE, and then to isolate-state:UNISOLATED.
> > The former transition does not seem to have any failure path for
> > cases where a DRC does not have any resources associated with it to
> > allocate for guest, but instead relies on the subsequent
> > isolation-state:UNISOLATED transition to indicate failure in this
> > situation.
> > 
> > Currently DRC code does not implement this logic, but instead
> > tries to indicate failure by refusing the allocation-state:USABLE
> > transition. Unfortunately, since that's not a documented failure
> > path, guests continue undeterred, causing undefined behavior in
> > QEMU and guest code.
> > 
> > Fix this by handling things as PAPR defines (13.7 and 13.7.3.1).
> > 
> > Cc: address@hidden
> > Cc: David Gibson <address@hidden>
> > Cc: Bharata B Rao <address@hidden>
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > v2:
> >  - actually include the full changeset in the patch
> 
> Several queries for clarification:

Looks like you've already picked this up, but just in case:

> 
>  * Is this intended to replace Bharata's patch "spapr_drc:
>    Return correct state for logical DR in entity_sense()" or to apply
>    on top of it?

Yes this should replace that patch.

> 
>  * If I'm understanding correctly, the problem here is that although
>    the guest is supposed to check for failures to set the allocation
>    state, it's actually not?  This patch is to make qemu gracefully
>    handle the guest's failure to do this?  Is that right?

The root issue is that allocation state setting doesn't actually have
a documented failure path. Instead, the subsequent isolation state
setting is where we surface an error if we're unable to actually
provide the device to the guest (due to it not being attached
to the DRC in question).

We weren't surfacing that error in the isolation state setting, so the
guest was continuing on with configuring devices that aren't actually
present. This patch should correct that.

Personally it seems like allocation state setting is where that failure
should occur, since that's the earliest point to surface the error, but
that's how PAPR has it documented.

>    
> > ---
> >  hw/ppc/spapr_drc.c         | 12 ++++++++++++
> >  hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c        |  9 +++++++--
> >  include/hw/ppc/spapr.h     |  1 +
> >  include/hw/ppc/spapr_drc.h |  2 ++
> >  4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_drc.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_drc.c
> > index 9ce844a..c1f664f 100644
> > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_drc.c
> > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_drc.c
> > @@ -66,6 +66,18 @@ static int set_isolation_state(sPAPRDRConnector *drc,
> >  
> >      DPRINTFN("drc: %x, set_isolation_state: %x", get_index(drc), state);
> >  
> > +    if (state == SPAPR_DR_ISOLATION_STATE_UNISOLATED) {
> > +        /* cannot unisolate a non-existant resource. this generally
> > +         * happens for logical resources where transitions from
> > +         * allocation-state:UNUSABLE to allocation-state:USABLE are
> > +         * unguarded, but instead rely on a subsequent
> > +         * isolation-state:UNISOLATED transition to indicate failure
> > +         */
> > +        if (!drc->dev) {
> > +            return -1;
> > +        }
> > +    }
> > +
> >      drc->isolation_state = state;
> >  
> >      if (drc->isolation_state == SPAPR_DR_ISOLATION_STATE_ISOLATED) {
> > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
> > index 3b7b20b..0ddedca 100644
> > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
> > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
> > @@ -372,6 +372,7 @@ static void rtas_set_indicator(PowerPCCPU *cpu, 
> > sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> >      uint32_t sensor_type;
> >      uint32_t sensor_index;
> >      uint32_t sensor_state;
> > +    int drc_ret, ret = RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS;
> >      sPAPRDRConnector *drc;
> >      sPAPRDRConnectorClass *drck;
> >  
> > @@ -413,7 +414,11 @@ static void rtas_set_indicator(PowerPCCPU *cpu, 
> > sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> >                  spapr_ccs_remove(spapr, ccs);
> >              }
> >          }
> > -        drck->set_isolation_state(drc, sensor_state);
> > +        drc_ret = drck->set_isolation_state(drc, sensor_state);
> > +        if (drc_ret != 0) {
> > +            ret = (drc_ret == -1) ? RTAS_OUT_NO_SUCH_INDICATOR
> > +                                  : RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR;
> > +        }
> >          break;
> >      case RTAS_SENSOR_TYPE_DR:
> >          drck->set_indicator_state(drc, sensor_state);
> > @@ -425,7 +430,7 @@ static void rtas_set_indicator(PowerPCCPU *cpu, 
> > sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> >          goto out_unimplemented;
> >      }
> >  
> > -    rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS);
> > +    rtas_st(rets, 0, ret);
> >      return;
> >  
> >  out_unimplemented:
> > diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> > index c75cc5e..ffb108d 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> > @@ -412,6 +412,7 @@ int spapr_allocate_irq_block(int num, bool lsi, bool 
> > msi);
> >  #define RTAS_OUT_BUSY               -2
> >  #define RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR        -3
> >  #define RTAS_OUT_NOT_SUPPORTED      -3
> > +#define RTAS_OUT_NO_SUCH_INDICATOR  -3
> >  #define RTAS_OUT_NOT_AUTHORIZED     -9002
> >  
> >  /* RTAS tokens */
> > diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_drc.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_drc.h
> > index 28ffeae..b2c1209 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_drc.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_drc.h
> > @@ -165,6 +165,8 @@ typedef struct sPAPRDRConnectorClass {
> >      /*< public >*/
> >  
> >      /* accessors for guest-visible (generally via RTAS) DR state */
> > +
> > +    /* returns -1 if DRC cannot be set to requested isolation state */
> >      int (*set_isolation_state)(sPAPRDRConnector *drc,
> >                                 sPAPRDRIsolationState state);
> >      int (*set_indicator_state)(sPAPRDRConnector *drc,
> 
> -- 
> David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
> david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
>                                 | _way_ _around_!
> http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]