[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 20/46] ivshmem: simplify a bit the code
From: |
Marc-André Lureau |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 20/46] ivshmem: simplify a bit the code |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:56:52 -0400 (EDT) |
----- Original Message -----
> On 15.09.2015 18:07, address@hidden wrote:
> > From: Marc-André Lureau <address@hidden>
> >
> > Use some more explicit variables to simplify the code.
> >
> > nth_eventfd variable is the current eventfd to be manipulated.
>
> well maybe a silly question, but then why not call it current_eventfd?
Either way, ok.
current_eventfd is the nth eventfd to be added :)
>
> > Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > hw/misc/ivshmem.c | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/misc/ivshmem.c b/hw/misc/ivshmem.c
> > index 1c98ec3..a60454f 100644
> > --- a/hw/misc/ivshmem.c
> > +++ b/hw/misc/ivshmem.c
> > @@ -488,9 +488,10 @@ static void ivshmem_read(void *opaque, const uint8_t
> > *buf, int size)
> > {
> > IVShmemState *s = opaque;
> > int incoming_fd;
> > - int guest_max_eventfd;
> > + int nth_eventfd;
> > long incoming_posn;
> > Error *err = NULL;
> > + Peer *peer;
> >
> > if (!fifo_update_and_get(s, buf, size,
> > &incoming_posn, sizeof(incoming_posn))) {
> > @@ -517,6 +518,8 @@ static void ivshmem_read(void *opaque, const uint8_t
> > *buf, int size)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + peer = &s->peers[incoming_posn];
> > +
> > if (incoming_fd == -1) {
> > /* if posn is positive and unseen before then this is our posn*/
> > if (incoming_posn >= 0 && s->vm_id == -1) {
> > @@ -564,27 +567,22 @@ static void ivshmem_read(void *opaque, const uint8_t
> > *buf, int size)
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > - /* each guest has an array of eventfds, and we keep track of how many
> > - * guests for each VM */
>
> you removed a few comments, do they no longer apply?
> If so do they need to be replaced with better ones mentioning how it works in
> contrast with the previous?
That comment didn't make much sense to me, especially the second part,
what about:
"each peer has an associated array of eventfds, and we keep track of how many
eventfd received so far"
>
> > - guest_max_eventfd = s->peers[incoming_posn].nb_eventfds;
> > + /* get a new eventfd */
> > + nth_eventfd = peer->nb_eventfds++;
> >
> > /* this is an eventfd for a particular guest VM */
> > IVSHMEM_DPRINTF("eventfds[%ld][%d] = %d\n", incoming_posn,
> > - guest_max_eventfd, incoming_fd);
> > -
> > event_notifier_init_fd(&s->peers[incoming_posn].eventfds[guest_max_eventfd],
> > - incoming_fd);
> > -
> > - /* increment count for particular guest */
> > - s->peers[incoming_posn].nb_eventfds++;
> > + nth_eventfd, incoming_fd);
> > + event_notifier_init_fd(&peer->eventfds[nth_eventfd], incoming_fd);
> >
> > if (incoming_posn == s->vm_id) {
> > - s->eventfd_chr[guest_max_eventfd] = create_eventfd_chr_device(s,
> > - &s->peers[s->vm_id].eventfds[guest_max_eventfd],
> > - guest_max_eventfd);
> > + s->eventfd_chr[nth_eventfd] = create_eventfd_chr_device(s,
> > + &s->peers[s->vm_id].eventfds[nth_eventfd],
> > + nth_eventfd);
> > }
> >
> > if (ivshmem_has_feature(s, IVSHMEM_IOEVENTFD)) {
> > - ivshmem_add_eventfd(s, incoming_posn, guest_max_eventfd);
> > + ivshmem_add_eventfd(s, incoming_posn, nth_eventfd);
> > }
> > }
> >
> >
>
> Ciao
> C.
>
>
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 19/46] ivshmem: print error on invalid peer id, marcandre . lureau, 2015/09/15
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 21/46] ivshmem: use common return, marcandre . lureau, 2015/09/15
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 22/46] ivshmem: use common is_power_of_2(), marcandre . lureau, 2015/09/15
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 23/46] ivshmem: migrate with VMStateDescription, marcandre . lureau, 2015/09/15
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 25/46] ivshmem: check shm isn't already initialized, marcandre . lureau, 2015/09/15
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 24/46] ivshmem: shmfd can be 0, marcandre . lureau, 2015/09/15