qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v10 6/7] vhost-user: add multiple queue support


From: Jason Wang
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v10 6/7] vhost-user: add multiple queue support
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 10:12:10 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0


On 09/23/2015 09:57 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 06:14:14PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
> [...]
>>> -static void net_vhost_link_down(VhostUserState *s, bool link_down)
>>> +static void net_vhost_link_down(int queues, NetClientState *ncs[],
>>> +                                bool link_down)
>>>  {
>>> -    s->nc.link_down = link_down;
>>> +    NetClientState *nc;
>>> +    int i;
>>>  
>>> -    if (s->nc.peer) {
>>> -        s->nc.peer->link_down = link_down;
>>> -    }
>>> +    for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) {
>>> +        nc = ncs[i];
>>>  
>>> -    if (s->nc.info->link_status_changed) {
>>> -        s->nc.info->link_status_changed(&s->nc);
>>> -    }
>>> +        nc->link_down = link_down;
>>> +
>>> +        if (nc->peer) {
>>> +            nc->peer->link_down = link_down;
>>> +        }
>>> +
>>> +        if (nc->info->link_status_changed) {
>>> +            nc->info->link_status_changed(nc);
>>> +        }
>>>  
>>> -    if (s->nc.peer && s->nc.peer->info->link_status_changed) {
>>> -        s->nc.peer->info->link_status_changed(s->nc.peer);
>>> +        if (nc->peer && nc->peer->info->link_status_changed) {
>>> +            nc->peer->info->link_status_changed(nc->peer);
>>> +        }
>>>      }
>>>  }
>> The semantics is a little bit difference with qmp_set_link. What's the
>> reason for this? If there's no specific reason, probably, we could just
>> reuse qmp_set_link() (or part of) here?
> I did this just because I refactored the vhost_user init code, making
> the char dev handler to initiate all ncs. Hence I turned net_vhost_link_down()
> to handle all ncs, just like what I did for vhost_user_start().
>
> And TBH, I'm not aware of qmp_set_link() before, and after reading the
> code, I do think we can simply invoke it instead. And thanks for the
> info.
>
>> Other looks good to me.
> Thanks for the review. May I add your reviewed-by if I fix above issue?
>
>       --yliu

I prefer to add it myself :)

Thanks.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]