[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 12/22] vhost: rename VHOST_RESET_OWNER to VHOST_R
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 12/22] vhost: rename VHOST_RESET_OWNER to VHOST_RESET_DEVICE |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Nov 2015 11:42:15 +0000 |
On 3 October 2015 at 17:33, Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 06:18:51PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 24/09/2015 15:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > From: Yuanhan Liu <address@hidden>
>> >
>> > Quote from Michael:
>> >
>> > We really should rename VHOST_RESET_OWNER to VHOST_RESET_DEVICE.
>>
>> Where is the corresponding Linux patch for this?
>>
>> I would like to fetch the updated headers for KVM, and this is breaking
>> it. In fact, a patch that just renames the #define (without providing
>> the old name for backwards compatibility) would be NACKed in upstream Linux.
>>
>> Paolo
>
> Right. And it turns out this whole approach is wrong. I intend to
> revert this patch, and also drop the patch sending VHOST_RESET_OWNER on
> device stop.
This revert doesn't seem to have happened, I think, which means
that this is one of the things which prevents a clean header-update
against kvm/next. Could we get this fixed for rc0, please?
thanks
-- PMM
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 12/22] vhost: rename VHOST_RESET_OWNER to VHOST_RESET_DEVICE,
Peter Maydell <=