qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 31/32] MAINTAINERS: add all-match entry for qemu-


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 31/32] MAINTAINERS: add all-match entry for qemu-devel@
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 16:01:30 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0


On 09/02/2016 14:47, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> >                                                The fallback now relies
>> > on finding a real person in MAINTAINERS, not just a mailing list for
> ... in fact all lists now are.  Entries with L: and without M:
> 
>     Maintained: LINUX, POSIX, i386 target
>     Odd fixes: GDB stub
>     Orphan: Gumstix, Mipssim, Stable 0.10, Stable 0.14, Stable 0.15

Not Stable 0.15 actually.

> For these, we now fall back to git.  Intentional?

Yes, intentional.  They are other instances of qemu-devel@ or, for
Gumstix, address@hidden  For some of them it may make sense to give them an
M too, for stable versions we probably should drop them.

> If yes, mention it in the commit message.

It is mentioned.  For gumstix, it says sub-community right after where
you cut it. :) "The fallback now relies on finding a real person in
MAINTAINERS, not just a mailing list for the relevant sub-community".

For others, there's no reason why it should be different from the
catch-all entry.

> If no, the easiest fix is to give them an M, if we can find a willing
> victim.
> 
> Aside: we also have entries with neither L: nor M:
> 
>     Orphan: LSI53C895A, M68K, an5206, dummy_m68k, mcf5208
> 
> Odd.

Not too odd considering they're Orphan. :)  In fact the above entries
could have their L removed too (apart from Gumstix again).

Paolo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]