qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/11] tcg/i386: Make direct jump patching threa


From: Sergey Fedorov
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/11] tcg/i386: Make direct jump patching thread-safe
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 19:15:55 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0

On 20/04/16 18:04, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 04/20/2016 02:55 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>> +static void tcg_out_nopn(TCGContext *s, int n)
>>> +{
>>> +    static const uint8_t nop1[] = { 0x90 };
>>> +    static const uint8_t nop2[] = { 0x66, 0x90 };
>>> +    static const uint8_t nop3[] = { 0x8d, 0x76, 0x00 };
>>> +    static const uint8_t *const nopn[] = { nop1, nop2, nop3 };
>>> +    int i;
>>> +    assert(n <= ARRAY_SIZE(nopn));
>>> +    for (i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
>>> +        tcg_out8(s, nopn[n - 1][i]);
>>> +    }
>>> +}
>>
>> *shudder* I recall x86 instruction encoding is weird. Maybe a comment
>>   for the function to describe the 3 forms of NOP we have here?
>
> I think I'd prefer to drop the tables and do
>
>   /* Emit 1 or 2 operand size prefixes for the standard one byte nop,
>      xchg %eax,%eax, forming xchg %ax,%ax.  All cores accept the
>      duplicate prefix, and all of the interesting recent cores can
>      decode and discard the duplicates in a single cycle.  */
>   for (i = 1; i < n; ++i) {
>     tcg_out8(s, 0x66);
>   }
>   tcg_out8(s, 0x90);

It's fine if you are sure about that :)

Kind regards,
Sergey



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]