qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH for 2.7 1/1] qcow2: improve qcow2_co_write_zeroes()


From: Denis V. Lunev
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for 2.7 1/1] qcow2: improve qcow2_co_write_zeroes()
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 15:05:27 +0300

Unfortunately Linux kernel could send non-aligned requests to qemu-nbd
if the caller is using O_DIRECT and does not align in-memory data to
page. Thus qemu-nbd will call block layer with non-aligned requests.

qcow2_co_write_zeroes forcibly asks the caller to supply block-aligned
data. In the other case it rejects with ENOTSUP which is properly
handled on the upper level. The problem is that this grows the image.

This could be optimized a bit:
- particular request could be split to block aligned part and head/tail,
  which could be handled separately
- writes could be omitted when we do know that the image already contains
  zeroes at the offsets being written

Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <address@hidden>
CC: Kevin Wolf <address@hidden>
CC: Max Reitz <address@hidden>
---
 block/qcow2.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/qcow2.c b/block/qcow2.c
index 470734b..9bdaa15 100644
--- a/block/qcow2.c
+++ b/block/qcow2.c
@@ -2411,21 +2411,69 @@ finish:
     return ret;
 }
 
+static int write_zeroes_chunk(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num, int nr)
+{
+    int ret, count;
+    BlockDriverState *file;
+    uint8_t *buf;
+    struct iovec iov;
+    QEMUIOVector local_qiov;
+
+    ret = bdrv_get_block_status_above(bs, NULL, sector_num, nr, &count, &file);
+    if (ret > 0 && (ret & BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO) && count == nr) {
+        /* Nothing to do. The area is zeroed already.
+           Worth to check to avoid image expansion for non-aligned reqs. */
+        return 0;
+    }
+
+    buf = qemu_blockalign0(bs, nr << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS);
+    iov = (struct iovec) {
+        .iov_base   = buf,
+        .iov_len    = nr << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS,
+    };
+    qemu_iovec_init_external(&local_qiov, &iov, 1);
+
+    return qcow2_co_writev(bs, sector_num, nr, &local_qiov);
+}
+
 static coroutine_fn int qcow2_co_write_zeroes(BlockDriverState *bs,
     int64_t sector_num, int nb_sectors, BdrvRequestFlags flags)
 {
     int ret;
     BDRVQcow2State *s = bs->opaque;
 
-    /* Emulate misaligned zero writes */
-    if (sector_num % s->cluster_sectors || nb_sectors % s->cluster_sectors) {
-        return -ENOTSUP;
+    int nr = sector_num % s->cluster_sectors;
+    if (nr != 0) {
+        nr = MIN(s->cluster_sectors - nr, nb_sectors);
+
+        ret = write_zeroes_chunk(bs, sector_num, nr);
+        if (ret < 0) {
+            return ret;
+        }
+
+        sector_num += nr;
+        nb_sectors -= nr;
+        if (nb_sectors == 0) {
+            return 0;
+        }
+    }
+
+    nr = nb_sectors % s->cluster_sectors;
+    if (nr != 0) {
+        ret = write_zeroes_chunk(bs, sector_num + nb_sectors - nr, nr);
+        if (ret < 0) {
+            return ret;
+        }
+
+        nb_sectors -= nr;
+        if (nb_sectors == 0) {
+            return 0;
+        }
     }
 
     /* Whatever is left can use real zero clusters */
     qemu_co_mutex_lock(&s->lock);
-    ret = qcow2_zero_clusters(bs, sector_num << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS,
-        nb_sectors);
+    ret = qcow2_zero_clusters(bs, sector_num << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS, nb_sectors);
     qemu_co_mutex_unlock(&s->lock);
 
     return ret;
-- 
2.5.0




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]