qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 6/7] hw/acpi: extend acpi pci hotplug suppor


From: Marcel Apfelbaum
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 6/7] hw/acpi: extend acpi pci hotplug support for pci express
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 14:47:24 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0

On 06/21/2016 02:28 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 12:05:12 +0300
Marcel Apfelbaum <address@hidden> wrote:

On 06/20/2016 05:11 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2016 20:48:37 +0300
Marcel Apfelbaum <address@hidden> wrote:

subj doesn't match patch, it does opposite i.e. makes sure that
pcie isn't counted in when building acpi hotplug aml


Maybe I wasn't clear enough. Until now q35 had no acpi hotplug code.
This patch adds acpi hotplug code for all Q35 PCI buses, but no for
pcie buses That means for pci-pci bridge and dmi-pci bridge.


Maybe I should rename it to hw/acpi: extend acpi pci hotplug support
for Q35 pci buses.
this looks better to me


Emit acpi code for pci hotplug on all PC machines:
   - if legacy pci hotpug is enabled (pcihp_bridge_en)
   - if there is at least one legacy pci bridge in current system
   - for PCI buses only (skip PCIe buses)

Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <address@hidden>
---
   hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 49
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed,
32 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
index 8ae3e53..cc51f9e 100644
--- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
+++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
@@ -250,6 +250,11 @@ static void acpi_get_pci_info(PcPciInfo *info)
                                               NULL);
   }

+static void acpi_test_pci_bus(PCIBus *bus, void *opaque)
+{
+    *(bool *)opaque |= !pci_bus_is_express(bus);
+}
+
   #define ACPI_PORT_SMI_CMD           0x00b2 /* TODO: this is
APM_CNT_IOPORT */
   static void acpi_align_size(GArray *blob, unsigned align)
@@ -422,7 +427,7 @@ static void *acpi_set_bsel(PCIBus *bus, void
*opaque) unsigned *bsel_alloc = opaque;
       unsigned *bus_bsel;

-    if (qbus_is_hotpluggable(BUS(bus))) {
+    if (qbus_is_hotpluggable(BUS(bus))
&& !pci_bus_is_express(bus)) { bus_bsel = g_malloc(sizeof
*bus_bsel);

           *bus_bsel = (*bsel_alloc)++;
@@ -433,15 +438,12 @@ static void *acpi_set_bsel(PCIBus *bus, void
*opaque) return bsel_alloc;
   }

-static void acpi_set_pci_info(void)
+static void acpi_set_pci_info(PCIBus *bus)
   {
-    PCIBus *bus = find_i440fx(); /* TODO: Q35 support */
       unsigned bsel_alloc = 0;

-    if (bus) {
-        /* Scan all PCI buses. Set property to enable acpi based
hotplug. */
-        pci_for_each_bus_depth_first(bus, acpi_set_bsel, NULL,
&bsel_alloc);
-    }
+    /* Scan all PCI buses. Set property to enable acpi based
hotplug. */
+    pci_for_each_bus_depth_first(bus, acpi_set_bsel, NULL,
&bsel_alloc); }

   static void build_append_pcihp_notify_entry(Aml *method, int
slot) @@ -503,7 +505,7 @@ static void
build_append_pci_bus_devices(Aml *parent_scope, PCIBus *bus,
            * In this case they aren't themselves hot-pluggable.
            * Hotplugged bridges *are* hot-pluggable.
            */
-        bridge_in_acpi = pc->is_bridge && pcihp_bridge_en &&
+        bridge_in_acpi = pc->is_bridge && !pc->is_express &&
pcihp_bridge_en && !DEVICE(pdev)->hotplugged;

           hotplug_enabled_dev = bsel && dc->hotpluggable
&& !bridge_in_acpi; @@ -1892,7 +1894,7 @@ static void
build_piix4_isa_bridge(Aml *table) aml_append(table, scope);
   }

-static void build_piix4_pci_hotplug(Aml *table)
+static void build_acpi_pci_hotplug(Aml *table)
   {
       Aml *scope;
       Aml *field;
@@ -1995,6 +1997,7 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, GArray
*linker, uint32_t nr_mem = machine->ram_slots;
       int root_bus_limit = 0xFF;
       PCIBus *root_bus = NULL;
+    bool has_pci_bus = false;
       int i;

       dsdt = init_aml_allocator();
@@ -2016,7 +2019,6 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, GArray
*linker, build_piix4_pm(dsdt);
           build_piix4_isa_bridge(dsdt);
           build_isa_devices_aml(dsdt);
-        build_piix4_pci_hotplug(dsdt);
           build_piix4_pci0_int(dsdt);
       } else {
           sb_scope = aml_scope("_SB");
@@ -2040,6 +2042,11 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, GArray
*linker, root_bus = PC_MACHINE(machine)->bus;
       assert(root_bus);

+    pci_for_each_bus(root_bus, acpi_test_pci_bus, &has_pci_bus);
+    if (pm->pcihp_bridge_en && has_pci_bus) {
             ^^^^^ wouldn't that forbid acpi hotplug on PCI0 is it's
not set?

Yes, and this is by design. 'pcihp_bridge_en' flag matches 'acpi
hotplug'. I followed the initialization phase, am I wrong? Can you
have acpi hotplug if the bit is off?
my understanding was that pcihp_bridge_en governs only hotplug
AML for bridges, while with it disabled hotplug AML would be
generated only for PCI0.


+        build_acpi_pci_hotplug(dsdt);
+    }
+
       build_cpu_hotplug_aml(dsdt);
       build_memory_hotplug_aml(dsdt, nr_mem, pm->mem_hp_io_base,
                                pm->mem_hp_io_len);
@@ -2050,7 +2057,7 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, GArray
*linker,

           aml_append(scope, aml_method("_L00", 0,
AML_NOTSERIALIZED));

-        if (misc->is_piix4) {
+        if (pm->pcihp_bridge_en && has_pci_bus) {
same question as above

               method = aml_method("_E01", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
               aml_append(method,
                   aml_acquire(aml_name("\\_SB.PCI0.BLCK"),
0xFFFF)); @@ -2188,7 +2195,7 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data,
GArray *linker, g_ptr_array_free(mem_ranges, true);

       /* reserve PCIHP resources */
-    if (pm->pcihp_io_len) {
+    if (pm->pcihp_bridge_en && has_pci_bus && pm->pcihp_io_len) {
same question as above

           dev = aml_device("PHPR");
           aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID",
aml_string("PNP0A06"))); aml_append(dev,
@@ -2326,10 +2333,14 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, GArray
*linker,

           {
               Aml *scope = aml_scope("PCI0");
+            bool scope_used = false;
Could you explain why ^^^ is needed?


Sure. If none ACPI code will be generated by the below 'if' statements
we will have an empty PCI0 scope. I wanted to get rid of it.
considering that hotplug AML for PCI0 is always generated, that seems
useless.


Not in Q35. pcie.0 is not hot-pluggable.
Run Q35 without a dmi-pci bridge or pci-bridge and you'll have an empty scope.


Thanks,
Marcel



Thanks,
Marcel


-            /* Scan all PCI buses. Generate tables to support
hotplug. */
-            build_append_pci_bus_devices(scope, root_bus,
-                                         pm->pcihp_bridge_en);
+            if (pm->pcihp_bridge_en && has_pci_bus) {
+                /* Scan all PCI buses. Generate tables to support
hotplug. */
+                build_append_pci_bus_devices(scope, root_bus,
+                                             pm->pcihp_bridge_en);
+                scope_used = true;
+            }

               if (misc->tpm_version != TPM_VERSION_UNSPEC) {
                   dev = aml_device("ISA.TPM");
@@ -2346,8 +2357,12 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, GArray
*linker, /* aml_append(crs, aml_irq_no_flags(TPM_TIS_IRQ)); */
                   aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_CRS", crs));
                   aml_append(scope, dev);
+                scope_used = true;
+            }
+
+            if (scope_used) {
+                aml_append(sb_scope, scope);
               }
-            aml_append(sb_scope, scope);
           }
           aml_append(dsdt, sb_scope);
       }
@@ -2870,7 +2885,7 @@ void acpi_setup(void)

       build_state = g_malloc0(sizeof *build_state);

-    acpi_set_pci_info();
+    acpi_set_pci_info(pcms->bus);

       acpi_build_tables_init(&tables);
       acpi_build(&tables, MACHINE(pcms));







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]