[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] x86: Physical address limit patches
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] x86: Physical address limit patches |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Jul 2016 13:46:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 |
On 05/07/2016 13:09, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > How do you handle migration in the above scenario from say 46bit host to
> > 39bit host, where the firmware has mapped (while running on the source)
> > a 64-bit BAR above the destination's maximum physical address?
>
> Again management would specify how much 64 bit pci space firmware should use.
> If more is specified than host can support we can error out.
Ok, so the destination would fail to start.
It sounds good, and it may provide a good reason not to enable
autodetection of phys-addr-bits for new machine types. We still want
David's patches for -cpu host, and for improved backwards compatibility
now that KVM_SET_MSR error detection is strict.
Thanks,
Paolo
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 6/6] x86: Add sanity checks on phys_bits, (continued)
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] x86: Physical address limit patches, Daniel P. Berrange, 2016/07/05