[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1613817] Re: x86: ret, lret and iret with noncanonical
From: |
Vda-linux |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1613817] Re: x86: ret, lret and iret with noncanonical IP saves wrong IP on the exception stack |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:09:39 -0000 |
# qemu-system-x86_64 --version
QEMU emulator version 2.6.92(qemu-2.7.0-0.1.rc2.fc26), Copyright (c) 2003-2008
Fabrice Bellard
Running it like this:
qemu-system-x86_64 -no-reboot -kernel "$bzImage" -initrd initramfs.cpio
-append "panic=1"
(i.e. no KVM, no unusual options)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1613817
Title:
x86: ret, lret and iret with noncanonical IP saves wrong IP on the
exception stack
Status in QEMU:
New
Bug description:
This test program:
# compile with: gcc -nostartfiles -nostdlib
_start: .globl _start
mov %ss,%eax
push %rax
push %rsp
pushf
mov %cs,%eax
push %rax
mov $0x1234567812345678,%rax
push %rax
//qemu bug: ip=1234567812345678, should be ip=0000000000400abc:
iretq
1:
jmp 1b
should segfault on IRET instruction because return address on stack is invalid
(it is not canonical). And it does, both on native CPU and in qemu.
But there is a difference: on native CPU, it fails before instruction is
executed,
IOW: saved IP points to the failed IRET:
# strace -i ./bad_ip_in_iret
[00007fa609805d57] execve("./bad_ip_in_iret", ["./bad_ip_in_iret"], [/* 54
vars */]) = 0
[00000000004000e7] --- SIGSEGV {si_signo=SIGSEGV, si_code=SI_KERNEL,
si_addr=0} ---
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^-NOTE THIS
[????????????????] +++ killed by SIGSEGV (core dumped) +++
In qemu, evidently instruction succeeds, and then emulated CPU throws an
exception because fetching instructions from non-canonical addresses is not
allowed:
/ # strace -i ./bad_ip_in_iret
[000000000041a790] execve("./bad_ip_in_iret", ["./bad_ip_in_iret"], [/* 5
vars */]) = 0
[1234567812345678] --- SIGSEGV {si_signo=SIGSEGV, si_code=SI_KERNEL,
si_addr=0} ---
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^-NOTE THIS
[????????????????] +++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
Segmentation fault
Thus, the emulation is not the same as real CPU.
This is not specific to IRET, the same happens with "far return" LRET,
and with ordinary RET instructions as well.
In qemu:
/ # strace -i ./bad_ip_in_lret
[000000000041a790] execve("./bad_ip_in_lret", ["./bad_ip_in_lret"], [/* 5
vars */]) = 0
[1234567812345678] --- SIGSEGV {si_signo=SIGSEGV, si_code=SI_KERNEL,
si_addr=0} ---
[????????????????] +++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
Segmentation fault
/ # strace -i ./bad_ip_in_ret
[000000000041a790] execve("./bad_ip_in_ret", ["./bad_ip_in_ret"], [/* 5 vars
*/]) = 0
[1234567812345678] --- SIGSEGV {si_signo=SIGSEGV, si_code=SI_KERNEL,
si_addr=0} ---
[????????????????] +++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
Segmentation fault
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1613817/+subscriptions