qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Problems with recent char changes (mux, slirp)


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Problems with recent char changes (mux, slirp)
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:26:13 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0


On 27/10/2016 13:52, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> Hi Marc-André,
>   I've got a bunch of different failures in current head
> that seem to bisect down to your recent char changes.
> 
> Lets start with the main symptoms;
> 1)
>   Slirp guestfwd is broken, start an nc with:
>       nc -l 127.0.0.1 4444
>     and then qemu with:
>     -netdev user,id=unet,guestfwd=tcp:10.0.2.50:4444-tcp:localhost:4444 
> -device e1000,netdev=unet 
> 
>     and from the guest do:
>     seq 1 10000000 | nc 10.0.2.50 4444 &
>     you should get a spew of numbers coming out of nc  but on current
>     head it does nothing.
> 
>     This seems to work at becdfa00cfa2995e859ccefa4b7d72a72eb96581
>     but segs by 386f07d1fc02fb4316039994b855c4feb9b091ce
>     and is silently broken somewhere around 
> 72ac876248ca2d33b3e1170b2f86fb68daaacdc8
> 
> 2)
>   If you start qemu with qemu-system-x86_64 -nographic
>   you normally get no output until you ctrl-a c at which
>   you get a banner and then a (qemu) prompt, however with current
>   head, at startup you get:
>    ./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -nographic
>    QEMU 2.7.50 monitor - type 'help' for more information
>    (qemu) 
> 
>    and although it gives you a prompt it's not responsive, so you
>    ctrl-ac and then you get a :
>    QEMU 2.7.50 monitor - type 'help' for more information
>    QEMU 2.7.50 monitor - type 'help' for more information
>    (qemu) 
>  
>    and it works - but you've got the extra banner.
> 
>    It's fine at 6dfa8298faa0fce47c68659fd4d92e76745d4edb
>    ecb672d14f092f481000ac9cd9d7dc0500692eba is broken but a bit differently
>    94a40fc56036b5058b0b194d9e372a22e65ce7be doesn't build (!)

This one is easy.  Marc-André, can you look at (1)? :)

Paolo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]