qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] virtio-net: Add support to MTU feature


From: Maxime Coquelin
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] virtio-net: Add support to MTU feature
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 14:04:52 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0



On 12/12/2016 11:34 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:12:56AM +0100, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
Hi Daniel,

On 12/12/2016 11:02 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 04:30:35PM +0100, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
Thanks for the reviews,

This series implements Virtio spec update from Aaron Conole which
defines a way for the host to expose its max MTU to the guest.

"host_mtu" parameter is added to provide QEMU with the MTU value,
and the backend, if supported, gets notified of the MTU value when the
MTU feature neogotiation succeeds.

Only user backend currently supports MTU notification. A new protocol
feature has been implemented for sending MTU value to the backend.

For kernel backend, it is expected the management tool also configures
the tap/macvtap interface with same MTU value.
Daniel, I would be interrested about your feedback on this implementation
from management tool point of view.

I can't give real feedback yet, as I'm not seeing clear information on
what problem this series is designed to solve....

Right, I agree it is missing a bit of context here, I'll add more about
the background in next revision.

The goal of this series is to address two things:
1. Providing a way for the guests to use the same MTU as the host,
   in order to have a consistent MTU value across the infrastructure.

Ok, currently libvirt sets the MTU of the tap device based on the MTU
of the device it will be attached to. This change means we need to pass
that MTU value into QEMU via the -netdev command line so it can inform
the guest what the MTU is.
Nice, do you have a pointer on where this is done in QEMU?

Thanks,
Maxime



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]