qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PULL 12/23] cpu-exec: tighten barrier on TCG_EXIT_REQUESTE


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 12/23] cpu-exec: tighten barrier on TCG_EXIT_REQUESTED
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:31:36 +0100

This seems to have worked just fine so far on weakly-ordered
architectures, but I don't see anything that prevents the
reordering from:

    store 1 to exit_request
    store 1 to tcg_exit_req
                                 load tcg_exit_req
                                 store 0 to tcg_exit_req
                                 load exit_request
                                 store 0 to exit_request
    store 1 to exit_request
    store 1 to tcg_exit_req

to this:

    store 1 to exit_request
    store 1 to tcg_exit_req
                                 load tcg_exit_req
                                 load exit_request
    store 1 to exit_request
    store 1 to tcg_exit_req
                                 store 0 to tcg_exit_req
                                 store 0 to exit_request

therefore losing a request.  It's possible that other memory barriers
(e.g. in rcu_read_unlock) are hiding it, but better safe than
sorry.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
---
 cpu-exec.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/cpu-exec.c b/cpu-exec.c
index 1f7d217..d50625b 100644
--- a/cpu-exec.c
+++ b/cpu-exec.c
@@ -552,11 +552,11 @@ static inline void cpu_loop_exec_tb(CPUState *cpu, 
TranslationBlock *tb,
          * have set something else (eg exit_request or
          * interrupt_request) which we will handle
          * next time around the loop.  But we need to
-         * ensure the tcg_exit_req read in generated code
+         * ensure the zeroing of tcg_exit_req (see cpu_tb_exec)
          * comes before the next read of cpu->exit_request
          * or cpu->interrupt_request.
          */
-        smp_rmb();
+        smp_mb();
         *last_tb = NULL;
         break;
     case TB_EXIT_ICOUNT_EXPIRED:
-- 
1.8.3.1





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]