qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: Exclude more cpu model code when bu


From: Bruce Rogers
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: Exclude more cpu model code when building s390x linux-user
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 12:59:19 -0700

>>> On 3/2/2017 at 12:53 PM, <address@hidden> wrote:
> Am 02.03.2017 um 20:50 schrieb David Hildenbrand:
>> Am 02.03.2017 um 20:33 schrieb Bruce Rogers:
>>> Currently qemu-s390x segfaults. Avoid cpu model code which doesn't
>>> apply in linux user case.
>> 
>> That was also my impression, but it does apply. However, for now it
>> doesn't matter, as also tcg isn't properly wired up.
>> 
>> In general, linux-user can support _at least_ the same features as tcg,
>> in theory even more (all that only apply to kernel space).
>> 
>> We had a proper fix on this list by Richard Henderson, wonder what
>> happened to that?
> 
> Actually it was Stefan Weil :) cc-ing him.

I'm not all so familiar with this code, I only saw a failure and fixed it the
most obvious way for me. I'm happy if there is a better fix out there.

BTW: I resent the patch again with SOB.

Brue

> 
>> 
>> This file should contain no CONFIG_USER_ONLY apart from the QMP
>> interface stuff.
>> 
>>> ---
>>>  target/s390x/cpu_models.c | 6 +++---
>>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c b/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
>>> index 2a894eec65..97e4e75f68 100644
>>> --- a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
>>> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
>>> @@ -590,7 +590,6 @@ CpuModelBaselineInfo 
> *arch_query_cpu_model_baseline(CpuModelInfo *infoa,
>>>      cpu_info_from_model(baseline_info->model, &model, true);
>>>      return baseline_info;
>>>  }
>>> -#endif
>>>  
>>>  static void check_consistency(const S390CPUModel *model)
>>>  {
>>> @@ -660,7 +659,6 @@ static void check_compatibility(const S390CPUModel 
> *max_model,
>>>  
>>>  static S390CPUModel *get_max_cpu_model(Error **errp)
>>>  {
>>> -#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>>>      static S390CPUModel max_model;
>>>      static bool cached;
>>>  
>>> @@ -680,9 +678,9 @@ static S390CPUModel *get_max_cpu_model(Error **errp)
>>>          cached = true;
>>>          return &max_model;
>>>      }
>>> -#endif
>>>      return NULL;
>>>  }
>>> +#endif
>>>  
>>>  static inline void apply_cpu_model(const S390CPUModel *model, Error **errp)
>>>  {
>>> @@ -718,6 +716,7 @@ static inline void apply_cpu_model(const S390CPUModel 
> *model, Error **errp)
>>>  
>>>  void s390_realize_cpu_model(CPUState *cs, Error **errp)
>>>  {
>>> +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>>>      S390CPUClass *xcc = S390_CPU_GET_CLASS(cs);
>>>      S390CPU *cpu = S390_CPU(cs);
>>>      const S390CPUModel *max_model;
>>> @@ -751,6 +750,7 @@ void s390_realize_cpu_model(CPUState *cs, Error **errp)
>>>      }
>>>  
>>>      apply_cpu_model(cpu->model, errp);
>>> +#endif
>>>  }
>>>  
>>>  static void get_feature(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
>>>
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Thanks,
> 
> David






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]