[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Apr 2017 13:00:08 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 |
On 04/04/2017 10:17, ciprian.barbu wrote:
>>
>> but we do NOT make any guarantees of supporting
>>
>> new qemu, old libvirt
>
> Sounds reasonable enough, I guess we didn't look at it this way.
Yes, but usually it's "new qemu, very old libvirt", like several years
old. I think this should be treated as a regression.
Between this issue and the problem with snapshots, it seems to me that
the op blockers was really, really premature.
Paolo
- Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs, Paolo Bonzini, 2017/04/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs, Kevin Wolf, 2017/04/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs, Paolo Bonzini, 2017/04/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs, Kevin Wolf, 2017/04/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs, Paolo Bonzini, 2017/04/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs, Kevin Wolf, 2017/04/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs, Kevin Wolf, 2017/04/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs, Eric Blake, 2017/04/03
Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs, Eric Blake, 2017/04/03
Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs, Peter Krempa, 2017/04/03
Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs, Kashyap Chamarthy, 2017/04/03