qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] qemu-io: add drain/undrain cmd


From: Fam Zheng
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] qemu-io: add drain/undrain cmd
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 19:53:18 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23)

On Mon, 05/15 13:26, Peter Lieven wrote:
> Am 15.05.2017 um 12:50 schrieb Fam Zheng:
> > On Mon, 05/15 12:02, Peter Lieven wrote:
> > > Hi Block developers,
> > > 
> > > I would like to add a feature to Qemu to drain all traffic from a block 
> > > so that
> > > I can take external snaphosts without the risk to that in the middle of a 
> > > write
> > > operation. Its meant for cases where where QGA freeze/thaw is not 
> > > available.
> > > 
> > > For me its enough to have this through qemu-io, but Kevin asked me to 
> > > check
> > > if its not worth to have a stable API for it and present it via QMP/HMP.
> > > 
> > > What are your thoughts?
> > For debugging purpose or a "hacky" usage where you know what you are doing, 
> > it
> > may be fine to have this. The only issue is it should be a separate flag, 
> > like
> > BlockJob.user_paused.
> 
> How can I add, remove such a flag?

Like bs->user_drained. Set it in "drain" command, then increment
bs->quiesce_counter if toggled; vise versa.

> 
> > 
> > What happens from guest perspective? In the case of virtio, the request 
> > queue is
> > not handled and -ETIMEDOUT may happen. With IDE, I/O commands are still 
> > handled,
> > the command is not effective (or rather the implementation is not complete).
> 
> That it only works with virtio is fine. However, the thing it does not work 
> correctly
> apply then also to all other users of the drained_begin/end functions, right?
> As for the timeout I only plan to drain the device for about 1 second.

It didn't matter because for IDE, the invariant (staying quiesced as long as
necessary) is already ensured by BQL.  Virtio is different because it supports
ioeventfd and data plane.

Fam



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]