qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] slirp: handle errors in sosendoob()


From: no-reply
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] slirp: handle errors in sosendoob()
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 11:22:20 -0700 (PDT)

Hi,

This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:

Message-id: address@hidden
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] slirp: handle errors in sosendoob()
Type: series

=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
#!/bin/bash

BASE=base
n=1
total=$(git log --oneline $BASE.. | wc -l)
failed=0

git config --local diff.renamelimit 0
git config --local diff.renames True

commits="$(git log --format=%H --reverse $BASE..)"
for c in $commits; do
    echo "Checking PATCH $n/$total: $(git log -n 1 --format=%s $c)..."
    if ! git show $c --format=email | ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --mailback -; then
        failed=1
        echo
    fi
    n=$((n+1))
done

exit $failed
=== TEST SCRIPT END ===

Updating 3c8cf5a9c21ff8782164d1def7f44bd888713384
Switched to a new branch 'test'
9af1ed0 slirp: Handle error returns from sosendoob()
ba36c86 slirp: Handle error returns from slirp_send() in sosendoob()

=== OUTPUT BEGIN ===
Checking PATCH 1/2: slirp: Handle error returns from slirp_send() in 
sosendoob()...
ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#33: FILE: slirp/socket.c:354:
+^I^Iuint32_t urgc = so->so_urgc;$

ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#36: FILE: slirp/socket.c:356:
+^I^Iif (len > urgc) {$

ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#37: FILE: slirp/socket.c:357:
+^I^I^Ilen = urgc;$

ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#38: FILE: slirp/socket.c:358:
+^I^I}$

ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#42: FILE: slirp/socket.c:360:
+^I^Iurgc -= len;$

ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#43: FILE: slirp/socket.c:361:
+^I^Iif (urgc) {$

ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#46: FILE: slirp/socket.c:363:
+^I^I^Iif (n > urgc) {$

ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#47: FILE: slirp/socket.c:364:
+^I^I^I^In = urgc;$

ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#48: FILE: slirp/socket.c:365:
+^I^I^I}$

ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#54: FILE: slirp/socket.c:370:
+^I}$

ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#59: FILE: slirp/socket.c:373:
+^Iif (n != len) {$

ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#60: FILE: slirp/socket.c:374:
+^I^IDEBUG_ERROR((dfd, "Didn't send all data urgently XXXXX\n"));$

ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#61: FILE: slirp/socket.c:375:
+^I}$

ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#64: FILE: slirp/socket.c:377:
+^Iif (n < 0) {$

ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#65: FILE: slirp/socket.c:378:
+^I^Ireturn n;$

ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#67: FILE: slirp/socket.c:380:
+^Iso->so_urgc -= n;$

ERROR: line over 90 characters
#68: FILE: slirp/socket.c:381:
+       DEBUG_MISC((dfd, " ---2 sent %d bytes urgent data, %d urgent bytes 
left\n", n, so->so_urgc));

ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#68: FILE: slirp/socket.c:381:
+^IDEBUG_MISC((dfd, " ---2 sent %d bytes urgent data, %d urgent bytes left\n", 
n, so->so_urgc));$

total: 18 errors, 0 warnings, 51 lines checked

Your patch has style problems, please review.  If any of these errors
are false positives report them to the maintainer, see
CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

Checking PATCH 2/2: slirp: Handle error returns from sosendoob()...
ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#25: FILE: slirp/sbuf.c:94:
+^I^I(void)sosendoob(so);$

ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#38: FILE: slirp/socket.c:407:
+^I^Iif (sosendoob(so) < so->so_urgc) {$

ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#39: FILE: slirp/socket.c:408:
+^I^I^I/* Treat a short write as a fatal error too,$

ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#40: FILE: slirp/socket.c:409:
+^I^I^I * rather than continuing on and sending the urgent$

ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#41: FILE: slirp/socket.c:410:
+^I^I^I * data as if it were non-urgent and leaving the$

ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#42: FILE: slirp/socket.c:411:
+^I^I^I * so_urgc count wrong.$

ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#43: FILE: slirp/socket.c:412:
+^I^I^I */$

ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#44: FILE: slirp/socket.c:413:
+^I^I^Igoto err_disconnected;$

ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#45: FILE: slirp/socket.c:414:
+^I^I}$

ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#58: FILE: slirp/socket.c:458:
+^I^Igoto err_disconnected;$

WARNING: line over 80 characters
#68: FILE: slirp/socket.c:487:
+       DEBUG_MISC((dfd, " --- sowrite disconnected, so->so_state = %x, errno = 
%d\n",

ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#68: FILE: slirp/socket.c:487:
+^IDEBUG_MISC((dfd, " --- sowrite disconnected, so->so_state = %x, errno = 
%d\n",$

ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#69: FILE: slirp/socket.c:488:
+^I^I    so->so_state, errno));$

ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#70: FILE: slirp/socket.c:489:
+^Isofcantsendmore(so);$

ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#71: FILE: slirp/socket.c:490:
+^Itcp_sockclosed(sototcpcb(so));$

ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
#72: FILE: slirp/socket.c:491:
+^Ireturn -1;$

total: 15 errors, 1 warnings, 48 lines checked

Your patch has style problems, please review.  If any of these errors
are false positives report them to the maintainer, see
CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

=== OUTPUT END ===

Test command exited with code: 1


---
Email generated automatically by Patchew [http://patchew.org/].
Please send your feedback to address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]