[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] translator mega-patch
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] translator mega-patch |
Date: |
Sun, 18 Jun 2017 19:26:49 +0100 |
On 18 June 2017 at 15:37, Lluís Vilanova <address@hidden> wrote:
> I seem to remember we discussed this at some point before I sent the first
> version, to allow multiple targets on the same binary, but decided against it.
>
> Still, I can leave the ops struct in place without even trying to support
> multiple targets. It should be a little bit slower (using function pointers
> instead of a "template"), but I don't think performance will suffer that much
> since we're at the translation path.
>
> Any other opinions on this and the point above?
Multiple targets in one binary is one of those things that I would
like to see us do some day. So while I wouldn't do huge amounts
of work purely to support it, if we have two designs which are
otherwise more-or-less equivalent and only one has a path available
to support multi-target binaries we should probably prefer that one.
thanks
-- PMM
- [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v6 0/6] translate: [tcg] Generic translation framework, Lluís Vilanova, 2017/06/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 3/6] target: [tcg] Add generic translation framework, Emilio G. Cota, 2017/06/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 3/6] target: [tcg] Add generic translation framework, Lluís Vilanova, 2017/06/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 3/6] target: [tcg] Add generic translation framework, Lluís Vilanova, 2017/06/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 3/6] target: [tcg] Add generic translation framework, Lluís Vilanova, 2017/06/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 3/6] target: [tcg] Add generic translation framework, Emilio G. Cota, 2017/06/19