qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 0/2] pci: allow PCI bus slots to be marked as


From: Mark Cave-Ayland
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 0/2] pci: allow PCI bus slots to be marked as reserved
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 11:37:44 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1

On 14/07/17 11:25, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:

> On 14/07/2017 12:59, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>> On 11/07/17 22:44, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>>
>>> For some machines it is impossible to plug devices into a particular
>>> PCI bus
>>> slot, e.g. for a real Ultra 5 there are 2 PCI bridges attached to the
>>> root
>>> bus behind which all devices must be plugged. Ignoring this rule will
>>> cause
>>> problems with interrupt routing since the interrupt numbers are
>>> calculated
>>> based upon PCI bridge id and secondary PCI bus slot id.
>>>
>>> This patchset adds a new slot_reserved_mask property to PCIBus which
>>> is a
>>> bitmask used to indicate whether PCI bus slots are reserved, i.e.
>>> they cannot
>>> be used for hot or cold plugging on a particular PCI bus.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <address@hidden>
>>>
>>> v2:
>>> - Rename dev_reserved_mask to slot_reserved_mask as suggested by Marcel
>>> - Squash patches 2 and 3 together
>>>
>>>
>>> Mark Cave-Ayland (2):
>>>    pci: move check for existing devfn into new pci_bus_devfn_available()
>>>      helper
>>>    pci: add reserved slot check to do_pci_register_device()
>>>
>>>   hw/pci/pci.c             |   34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>>   include/hw/pci/pci_bus.h |    1 +
>>>   2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> Ping? Any further feedback on the v2 version? My latest set of sun4u
>> patches is dependent upon this patchset and it's freeze coming up next
>> week!
>>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> As in prev version, other than the minor comment
> on replacing "if (...) return true; else return false"
> with the actual value, I am OK with it.

Okay great! So change pci_bus_devfn_available() to something like this?

static bool pci_bus_devfn_available(PCIBus *bus, int devfn)
{
    return !(bus->devices[devfn]);
}

> I believe Michael asked to see the series using this feature,
> can you add a link to it, or post it with the dependency on this one?

Sure, I posted the link earlier in the week:
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-07/msg03045.html.
Or more specifically:

https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-07/msg03041.html


ATB,

Mark.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]