Re: [Qemu-devel] Unified Datagram Socket Transport

[Anton Ivanov]

That is an option as well. 

I am travelling this week and will get back to this first thing next week.

A.

On 24 July 2017 05:17:25 CEST, Jason Wang <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
>On 2017年07月21日 12:25, Anton Ivanov wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 21/07/17 04:55, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2017年07月21日 03:12, address@hidden wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> This addresses comments so far except Eric's suggestion to use
>>>> InetSocketAddressBase. If I understand correctly its intended use,
>>>> it will not be of help for protocols which have no port (raw
>>>> sockets - GRE, L2TPv3, etc).
>>>>
>>>> It also includes a port of the original socket.c transport to
>>>> the new UDST backend. The relevant code is ifdef-ed so there
>>>> should be no effect on other systems.
>>>
>>> This looks sub-optimal. If you want to do this, I would rather 
>>> suggest you just extend the socket dgram backend like what udst did
>now.
>>
>> Apologies, do you mean extend it further to handle the tcp form? 
>
>Not that far, since you try to convert net_dgram_socket_info, I'm 
>thinking just do the all udst in net_dgram_socket. For recvmmsg you can
>
>have transport specific callback for this.
>
>Thanks

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.