qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 4/6] target/s390x: move wrap_address to cpu.h


From: David Hildenbrand
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 4/6] target/s390x: move wrap_address to cpu.h
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 20:00:53 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0

On 24.07.2017 20:00, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 07/24/2017 10:38 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 24.07.2017 06:40, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> On 07/21/2017 05:56 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand<address@hidden>
>>>> ---
>>>>    target/s390x/cpu.h        | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>>>    target/s390x/mem_helper.c | 14 --------------
>>>>    2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
>>>
>>> Although another header, private to the helpers, might be better...
>>>
>>
>> Question is if we should have a new header for stuff really only used
>> locally in target/s390x - in contrast to say cpu.h, which is included
>> from various other places. So not only a header for helpers, but also
>> used for e.g. kvm.c.
>>
>> This header could e.g. be called cpu_helper.h and would not included in
>> cpu.h
> 
> C.f. target/arm/internals.h, which is a bit better as a name, I think.
> Perhaps something to wait for 2.11 tree though, and we'll do it proper.
> 
> 
> r~
> 

Sounds good to me.

-- 

Thanks,

David



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]