qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 09/11] target/s390x: tcg_s390_program_interru


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 09/11] target/s390x: tcg_s390_program_interrupt() will never return
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 22:45:58 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0

On 30.08.2017 19:05, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> The assert should hold in both scenarios.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <address@hidden>
> ---
>  target/s390x/interrupt.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/s390x/interrupt.c b/target/s390x/interrupt.c
> index 058e219fe5..79bab5e2f3 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/interrupt.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/interrupt.c
> @@ -32,9 +32,8 @@ static void tcg_s390_program_interrupt(CPUS390XState *env, 
> uint32_t code,
>  #ifdef CONFIG_TCG
>      trigger_pgm_exception(env, code, ilen);
>      cpu_loop_exit(CPU(s390_env_get_cpu(env)));
> -#else
> -    g_assert_not_reached();
>  #endif
> +    g_assert_not_reached();
>  }

Not sure if this really makes sense ... cpu_loop_exit() is already
marked with QEMU_NORETURN, so a know-it-all new version of GCC might
complain one day if there's other code after this call. I'd better keep
it the way it is.

 Thomas



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]