Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qemu-web] Suggest qemu-web prefix in the introductory post

[Eric Blake]

On 11/28/2017 07:58 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> Chances are address@hidden patches only adding new files can be
> picked up by patchew and treated like a qemu.git patch. Patchew already
> ignores [qemu-web] patches, so suggest it in this article as well. (Are
> there better places to document this?)
>
> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <address@hidden>
> ---
>   _posts/2017-02-04-the-new-qemu-website-is-up.md | 3 ++-
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/_posts/2017-02-04-the-new-qemu-website-is-up.md 
> b/_posts/2017-02-04-the-new-qemu-website-is-up.md
> index 66d3181..c16053c 100644
> --- a/_posts/2017-02-04-the-new-qemu-website-is-up.md
> +++ b/_posts/2017-02-04-the-new-qemu-website-is-up.md
> @@ -19,7 +19,8 @@ and the source code for the website can be cloned from the
>   repository.  Just like for any other project hosted by QEMU, the best way
>   to propose or contribute a new change is by sending a patch through the
>   address@hidden(https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel)
> -mailing list.
> +mailing list. (Add `[qemu-web PATCH]` to the subject so that CI will not be
> +confused with qemu.git patches.)
>   

I suggest mentioning that "git config format.subjectprefix 'qemu-web 
PATCH"' will automate that process, so you don't have to think about it 
when doing git send-email.

--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org