[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 13/16] target/arm: Move cpu_get_tb_cpu_state
From: |
Richard Henderson |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 13/16] target/arm: Move cpu_get_tb_cpu_state out of line |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Jan 2018 08:18:29 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 |
On 01/22/2018 07:07 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Richard Henderson <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> target/arm/cpu.h | 127
>> +---------------------------------------------------
>> target/arm/helper.c | 126
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 125 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
>> index c8e8155b6e..2de1afb53a 100644
>> --- a/target/arm/cpu.h
>> +++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
>> @@ -2703,71 +2703,6 @@ static inline bool bswap_code(bool sctlr_b)
>> #endif
>> }
>>
>> -/* Return the exception level to which FP-disabled exceptions should
>> - * be taken, or 0 if FP is enabled.
>> - */
>> -static inline int fp_exception_el(CPUARMState *env)
>> -{
>> - int fpen;
>> - int cur_el = arm_current_el(env);
>> -
>> - /* CPACR and the CPTR registers don't exist before v6, so FP is
>> - * always accessible
>> - */
>> - if (!arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_V6)) {
>> - return 0;
>> - }
>> -
>> - /* The CPACR controls traps to EL1, or PL1 if we're 32 bit:
>> - * 0, 2 : trap EL0 and EL1/PL1 accesses
>> - * 1 : trap only EL0 accesses
>> - * 3 : trap no accesses
>> - */
>> - fpen = extract32(env->cp15.cpacr_el1, 20, 2);
>> - switch (fpen) {
>> - case 0:
>> - case 2:
>> - if (cur_el == 0 || cur_el == 1) {
>> - /* Trap to PL1, which might be EL1 or EL3 */
>> - if (arm_is_secure(env) && !arm_el_is_aa64(env, 3)) {
>> - return 3;
>> - }
>> - return 1;
>> - }
>> - if (cur_el == 3 && !is_a64(env)) {
>> - /* Secure PL1 running at EL3 */
>> - return 3;
>> - }
>> - break;
>> - case 1:
>> - if (cur_el == 0) {
>> - return 1;
>> - }
>> - break;
>> - case 3:
>> - break;
>> - }
>> -
>> - /* For the CPTR registers we don't need to guard with an ARM_FEATURE
>> - * check because zero bits in the registers mean "don't trap".
>> - */
>> -
>> - /* CPTR_EL2 : present in v7VE or v8 */
>> - if (cur_el <= 2 && extract32(env->cp15.cptr_el[2], 10, 1)
>> - && !arm_is_secure_below_el3(env)) {
>> - /* Trap FP ops at EL2, NS-EL1 or NS-EL0 to EL2 */
>> - return 2;
>> - }
>> -
>> - /* CPTR_EL3 : present in v8 */
>> - if (extract32(env->cp15.cptr_el[3], 10, 1)) {
>> - /* Trap all FP ops to EL3 */
>> - return 3;
>> - }
>> -
>> - return 0;
>> -}
>> -
>> #ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>> static inline bool arm_cpu_bswap_data(CPUARMState *env)
>> {
>> @@ -2814,66 +2749,8 @@ static inline uint32_t arm_regime_tbi1(CPUARMState
>> *env, ARMMMUIdx mmu_idx)
>> }
>> #endif
>>
>> -static inline void cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(CPUARMState *env, target_ulong *pc,
>> - target_ulong *cs_base, uint32_t
>> *flags)
>> -{
>> - ARMMMUIdx mmu_idx = core_to_arm_mmu_idx(env, cpu_mmu_index(env, false));
>> - if (is_a64(env)) {
>> - *pc = env->pc;
>> - *flags = ARM_TBFLAG_AARCH64_STATE_MASK;
>> - /* Get control bits for tagged addresses */
>> - *flags |= (arm_regime_tbi0(env, mmu_idx) << ARM_TBFLAG_TBI0_SHIFT);
>> - *flags |= (arm_regime_tbi1(env, mmu_idx) << ARM_TBFLAG_TBI1_SHIFT);
>> - } else {
>> - *pc = env->regs[15];
>> - *flags = (env->thumb << ARM_TBFLAG_THUMB_SHIFT)
>> - | (env->vfp.vec_len << ARM_TBFLAG_VECLEN_SHIFT)
>> - | (env->vfp.vec_stride << ARM_TBFLAG_VECSTRIDE_SHIFT)
>> - | (env->condexec_bits << ARM_TBFLAG_CONDEXEC_SHIFT)
>> - | (arm_sctlr_b(env) << ARM_TBFLAG_SCTLR_B_SHIFT);
>> - if (!(access_secure_reg(env))) {
>> - *flags |= ARM_TBFLAG_NS_MASK;
>> - }
>> - if (env->vfp.xregs[ARM_VFP_FPEXC] & (1 << 30)
>> - || arm_el_is_aa64(env, 1)) {
>> - *flags |= ARM_TBFLAG_VFPEN_MASK;
>> - }
>> - *flags |= (extract32(env->cp15.c15_cpar, 0, 2)
>> - << ARM_TBFLAG_XSCALE_CPAR_SHIFT);
>> - }
>> -
>> - *flags |= (arm_to_core_mmu_idx(mmu_idx) << ARM_TBFLAG_MMUIDX_SHIFT);
>> -
>> - /* The SS_ACTIVE and PSTATE_SS bits correspond to the state machine
>> - * states defined in the ARM ARM for software singlestep:
>> - * SS_ACTIVE PSTATE.SS State
>> - * 0 x Inactive (the TB flag for SS is always 0)
>> - * 1 0 Active-pending
>> - * 1 1 Active-not-pending
>> - */
>> - if (arm_singlestep_active(env)) {
>> - *flags |= ARM_TBFLAG_SS_ACTIVE_MASK;
>> - if (is_a64(env)) {
>> - if (env->pstate & PSTATE_SS) {
>> - *flags |= ARM_TBFLAG_PSTATE_SS_MASK;
>> - }
>> - } else {
>> - if (env->uncached_cpsr & PSTATE_SS) {
>> - *flags |= ARM_TBFLAG_PSTATE_SS_MASK;
>> - }
>> - }
>> - }
>> - if (arm_cpu_data_is_big_endian(env)) {
>> - *flags |= ARM_TBFLAG_BE_DATA_MASK;
>> - }
>> - *flags |= fp_exception_el(env) << ARM_TBFLAG_FPEXC_EL_SHIFT;
>> -
>> - if (arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(env)) {
>> - *flags |= ARM_TBFLAG_HANDLER_MASK;
>> - }
>> -
>> - *cs_base = 0;
>> -}
>> +void cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(CPUARMState *env, target_ulong *pc,
>> + target_ulong *cs_base, uint32_t *flags);
>>
>> enum {
>> QEMU_PSCI_CONDUIT_DISABLED = 0,
>> diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
>> index 984a4b1306..9e673bb672 100644
>> --- a/target/arm/helper.c
>> +++ b/target/arm/helper.c
>> @@ -11701,3 +11701,129 @@ uint32_t HELPER(crc32c)(uint32_t acc, uint32_t
>> val, uint32_t bytes)
>> /* Linux crc32c converts the output to one's complement. */
>> return crc32c(acc, buf, bytes) ^ 0xffffffff;
>> }
>> +
>> +/* Return the exception level to which FP-disabled exceptions should
>> + * be taken, or 0 if FP is enabled.
>> + */
>> +static inline int fp_exception_el(CPUARMState *env)
>
> You can drop the inline here. The compiler knows what to do and we are
> no longer in a header.
>
>> +{
>> + int fpen;
>> + int cur_el = arm_current_el(env);
>> +
>> + /* CPACR and the CPTR registers don't exist before v6, so FP is
>> + * always accessible
>> + */
>> + if (!arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_V6)) {
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* The CPACR controls traps to EL1, or PL1 if we're 32 bit:
>> + * 0, 2 : trap EL0 and EL1/PL1 accesses
>> + * 1 : trap only EL0 accesses
>> + * 3 : trap no accesses
>> + */
>> + fpen = extract32(env->cp15.cpacr_el1, 20, 2);
>> + switch (fpen) {
>> + case 0:
>> + case 2:
>> + if (cur_el == 0 || cur_el == 1) {
>> + /* Trap to PL1, which might be EL1 or EL3 */
>> + if (arm_is_secure(env) && !arm_el_is_aa64(env, 3)) {
>> + return 3;
>> + }
>> + return 1;
>> + }
>> + if (cur_el == 3 && !is_a64(env)) {
>> + /* Secure PL1 running at EL3 */
>> + return 3;
>> + }
>> + break;
>> + case 1:
>> + if (cur_el == 0) {
>> + return 1;
>> + }
>> + break;
>> + case 3:
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* For the CPTR registers we don't need to guard with an ARM_FEATURE
>> + * check because zero bits in the registers mean "don't trap".
>> + */
>> +
>> + /* CPTR_EL2 : present in v7VE or v8 */
>> + if (cur_el <= 2 && extract32(env->cp15.cptr_el[2], 10, 1)
>> + && !arm_is_secure_below_el3(env)) {
>> + /* Trap FP ops at EL2, NS-EL1 or NS-EL0 to EL2 */
>> + return 2;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* CPTR_EL3 : present in v8 */
>> + if (extract32(env->cp15.cptr_el[3], 10, 1)) {
>> + /* Trap all FP ops to EL3 */
>> + return 3;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> I'm not sure helper.c is the best place for this. Maybe cpu.c?
Because sve_exception_el will also be used for protecting access to the SVE
system registers, all of which are defined here in helper.c.
r~
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 12/16] target/arm: Add ZCR_ELx, (continued)
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 15/16] target/arm: Simplify fp_exception_el for user-only, Richard Henderson, 2018/01/18
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 14/16] target/arm: Hoist store to flags output in cpu_get_tb_cpu_state, Richard Henderson, 2018/01/18
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 16/16] target/arm: Add SVE state to TB->FLAGS, Richard Henderson, 2018/01/18
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 13/16] target/arm: Move cpu_get_tb_cpu_state out of line, Richard Henderson, 2018/01/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/16] target/arm: Prepatory work for SVE, no-reply, 2018/01/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/16] target/arm: Prepatory work for SVE, Peter Maydell, 2018/01/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/16] target/arm: Prepatory work for SVE, Alex Bennée, 2018/01/22