qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2 12/18] s390x: fix size + content


From: David Hildenbrand
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2 12/18] s390x: fix size + content of STSI blocks
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 10:42:33 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2

On 25.01.2018 14:51, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 14:15:45 +0100
> David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> On 25.01.2018 11:26, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 18:40:41 +0100
>>> David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>   
>>>> All blocks are 4k in size, which is only true for two of them right now.
>>>> Also some reserved fields were wrong, fix it and convert all reserved
>>>> fields to u8.
>>>>
>>>> This also fixes the LPAR part output in /proc/sysinfo under TCG. (for
>>>> now, everything was indicated as 0)
>>>>
>>>> While at it, introduce typedefs for these structs and use it in KVM
>>>> code. Not changing misc_helper.c as that will be overhauled soon.
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
>>>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <address@hidden>
>>>> ---
>>>>  target/s390x/cpu.h | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>>>>  target/s390x/kvm.c |  2 +-
>>>>  2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
>>>> index b4a88830de..31593a5381 100644
>>>> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
>>>> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
>>>> @@ -436,29 +436,31 @@ static inline void setcc(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t cc)
>>>>  #define STSI_R1_SEL2_MASK       0x000000000000ffffULL
>>>>  
>>>>  /* Basic Machine Configuration */
>>>> -struct sysib_111 {
>>>> -    uint32_t res1[8];
>>>> +typedef struct sysib_111 {
>>>> +    uint8_t  res1[32];
>>>>      uint8_t  manuf[16];
>>>>      uint8_t  type[4];
>>>>      uint8_t  res2[12];
>>>>      uint8_t  model[16];
>>>>      uint8_t  sequence[16];
>>>>      uint8_t  plant[4];
>>>> -    uint8_t  res3[156];
>>>> -};
>>>> +    uint8_t  res3[3996];
>>>> +} sysib_111;  
>>>
>>> Do you want to CamelCase this?  
>>
>> "System-information block" "SysIB" ?
> 
> Looks good to me.

If there are no further comments, I can resend.

-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]