qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/14] migration: let incoming side use thread c


From: Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/14] migration: let incoming side use thread context
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 09:58:24 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)

* Peter Xu (address@hidden) wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 05:43:50PM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Peter Xu (address@hidden) wrote:
> > > The old incoming migration is running in main thread and default
> > > gcontext.  With the new qio_channel_add_watch_full() we can now let it
> > > run in the thread's own gcontext (if there is one).
> > > 
> > > Currently this patch does nothing alone.  But when any of the incoming
> > > migration is run in another iothread (e.g., the upcoming migrate-recover
> > > command), this patch will bind the incoming logic to the iothread
> > > instead of the main thread (which may already get page faulted and
> > > hanged).
> > 
> > Does this make any difference to the Postcopy listener thread, which
> > takes over reading from the main thread once in postcopy mode?
> > (See savevm.c:postcopy_ram_listen_thread).
> 
> It should not.  It should only affect when use sends a
> "migrate-recover" with "run-oob=true".  The rest should be the same as
> before.  And since the postcopy ram load thread is a standalone thread
> with its own initial thread stack (so it's not really in a gmainloop),
> I can hardly tell how that can be affected since it'll always use its
> own thread stack.

OK, I think that's the bit I was worrying about; just since it was
another thread that ended up reading from the fd originally handled
by the incoming side main thread.

Dave

> Or, have I missed anything?
> 
> -- 
> Peter Xu
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / address@hidden / Manchester, UK



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]