qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/15] qio: general non-default GMainContext


From: Peter Xu
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/15] qio: general non-default GMainContext support
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 14:48:04 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)

On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 04:07:06PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 04:44:23PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > This is another preparation work for monitor OOB seires.
> > 
> > V1: http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-02/msg06972.html
> > 
> > V2 rewrote the bottom half of the code.  The first 8 patches are
> > mostly the same, but I rewrote the last patches to solve both TLS and
> > reconnect use cases by introducing a machine_done hook for chardevs in
> > general.  So if I copy the problems:
> > 
> > - migration
> >   - incoming side: still always running on main context, while we need
> >     to be able to run some command in OOB thread [1]
> > - tcp chardev (non-tcp chardevs should all support non-NULL context now)
> >   - server listening mode: QIO net listener used [2]
> >   - TELNET session: an isolated GSource used (tcp_chr_telnet_init) [3]
> >   - when "reconnect=N" is used, QIO threaded task is used [4]
> >   - TLS session: QIO tls handshake is used (tcp_chr_tls_init) [5]
> > 
> > Problem [1-3] are still fixed in the old way, but [4-5] now are fixed
> > by using the new machine_done notifier.
> 
> The QIO code changes all look good to me know, aside from minor
> comments. I really dislike all of the chardev stuff though. I
> think it makes the chardev code even harder to follow & rationalize
> behaviour of.
> 
> If you post a v3 series contaning just the qio/ directory changes,
> I'd queue those patches, while we discuss chardev stuff more.
> 
> I struggle to suggest better approach, because its any missing
> context of how the changes are going to be used, presumably by
> patch series yet to be posted. 

Yeah I think I'll split the series into two.

Thank you and Paolo for the quick review comments!

-- 
Peter Xu



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]